• erwan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    The population in rural areas is so low that no matter how you induce demand, it won’t work.

    • anachronist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Look up “interurban railways”. Most towns east of the Mississippi used to have frequent rail service with whistle stops at every farm and crossroads. In addition to passengers these railroads also transported the harvest, Sears purchases, kit houses, even hearses!

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This almost certainly wouldn’t work in the United States but it does in Europe because Europe has loads of these tiny abandoned rail lines (often single track) that were built in the 1800s and then abandoned. They don’t go anywhere particularly densely populated, you know because of the industrial Revolution causing everyone to move to the cities, so there isn’t the demand for a full rail service. Meaning they’re not going to spend the money upgrading the infrastructure to modern standards.

        This means they can be used at relatively cheap cost. As long as the tracks are still physically present all they need to do is cut some weeds down and put these things on the line and they’re good to go. It’s a cheap project that a local municipal authority can handle without having to involve wider government.