• 133arc585@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US already has 80k troops there, 3k more isn’t some kind of escalation.

      Is 83K more than 80K? Yes? Then it’s an escalation.

    • Nepoleon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf is this comment tree. I have a feeling some of the comments I read are made by russian bots trying to make 3k soldiers seem like a dramatic red line news when so many more notworthy things were done in the past years.

      Wouldnt surprise me. Lemmy has no tools to prevent russian bots and propaganda at all. Lemmy doesnt even have Voting contest mode or multi account detection to prevent manipulation

      • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or maybe some are by pentagon hawks looking to stoke the flames of war?

        Seriously though, calling people who don’t parrot your opinion bots is toxic rhetoric. You are more than welcome to examine who is making what votes, that information is all public. But if you were to take a close look at my account (and others whom I assume you are accusing of being bots) we are all organic Lemmy accounts.

        3k is 3k. It’s an increase. It’s not war starting today but it’s definitely not a step in the right direction. Calling attention to the likely scenarios of the US escalating their military presence in the region is most certainly not Russian propaganda just because it contradicts the American propaganda.

        • ikiru@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Typical reddit liberal moment calling someone who doesn’t agree with the US a “Russian bot”.

          • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah it’s more like calling someone carrying water for Russia and blaming the US for a war that Russia started a year ago a Russian bot.

            • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nobody is blaming the US for starting this war. We are all literally saying that an escalation like committing troops would escalate quickly into nuclear war and we are criticizing the US for taking even baby steps in that direction.

              Compare that with you trying to dive head first into a nuclear conflict we don’t belong in. Which weapons manufacturer or military branch do you work for?

              • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You have stated multiple times in your comments that the US is trying to start a war. Several other people have called you out on this.

                Nobody is buying your nuclear war propaganda. You’re just trying to give cover to Russian aggression in an attempt to allow them to capture control of Ukraine. What happens if they do capture Ukraine and then invade yet another country with all these new conscripts? Would you once again tell us to just sit around and watch because you’re ‘scared’ that we might upset Russia? How long do you keep that up? This parallels Germany in the early 20th century. Those wars didn’t end because people sat by and let them do what they want for fear of conflict.

                • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You have stated multiple times in your comments that the US is trying to start a war. Several other people have called you out on this.

                  Literally where? I have only ever stated the fact that the US commiting troops on the ground would escalate the current conflict into WW3. I’m literally here arguing for peace and not to escalate to nuclear Armageddon. L

                  You on the other hand seem very much determined to see as much of the world burn as possible and it’s sick. Learn some history and become aware of what would actually happen if your wet dreams come true

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why do you keep phrasing this as if a war didn’t already start over a year ago after Russia invaded Ukraine?

          Seems you’d rather see innocent Ukranians slaughtered than offer them any aid. Why is that?

          • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because the US is not involved directly. They are not at war here nor should they be. A direct intervention by the us will directly lead to an exchange of nuclear weapons.

            I’d rather see nobody die, but seeing as we’re in the situation were in I’d prefer if the whole world didn’t go up in flames just to offer Ukrainians aid.

            You keep seeming to think that the US is solely responsible for Ukraine, why is that?

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We’re in a post about the US sending troops to Europe which is why I’m talking about the US’s involvement. I suppose when you work at a troll farm it’s hard to keep all the separate posts straight, eh?

          • arcturus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s not that; it’s that it’s the US doing it for a country halfway across the world, as if we’re actually going there to help instead of taking advantage of the situation because Russia’s involved

            if we do go there, it’s not gonna be for aid

      • dot20@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s no surprise; the Lemmy developers are literally tankies. This instance’s name literally ends in .ml (Marxism-Leninism).

    • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it being done?

      This is how things start. Just like with weapons assistance, first it’s a little then it’s billions on the regular. This is an increase to an already way oversized presence of a foreign continents military in a delicate situation.

      • lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not a delicate situation for Ukrainians, they’re defending their freedom. Accusing the US of escalation here when Russia violently invaded it’s peaceful neighbor?

        • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, and Ukraine has every right to defend their country. The US escalating the situation by involving troops brings this from a regional conflict to a global nuclear war. The US escalating this can lead to nuclear aniahialation

        • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Accusing the US of escalation here when Russia violently invaded it’s peaceful neighbor?

          Do you understand what escalation means? Escalation doesn’t have anything to do with who started it. It’s a relative action: it escalates from some state. The USA is committing troops where it previously hadn’t (or, more pedantically, is increasing the number of committed troops). This is escalation.

          You can complain about Russia starting this, but you should also complain about the USA escalating the situation.

        • arcturus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean the first issue here is that you think the US government actually gives a shit about humanitarian things; they’re doing this because it’ll be beneficial to them, not out of the goodness of their heart

          you really need to understand that you can’t take the US at its word when it says it’s sending soldiers to another country for moral reasons

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No country on the planet is any different. Just so happens the us is aligned with the global west in deciding to support Ukraine. That’s just how it is.

            At the same time NATO is consolidating membership, again, for geopolitical gain, not charity.

            Welcome to reality. Declaring the US a sane geopolitical operator is not the hot take you think it is.