• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, tenure definitely a double-edged sword. On the one hand, being able to voice potentially unpopular opinions is important. On the other, having dead weight occupying faculty positions which brilliant younger folk would kill for — folks who would be more productive, more engaged, and contribute more to the world — is…well, maybe not great.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Feels like we could have both by ditching tenure and allowing professors to express their opinions (so long as it doesn’t interfere with teaching, of course).

          Anecdotally, my business ethics professor in college was a very open libertarian. I’ll never agree with his politics, but despite that, he was an excellent teacher, and one of the better ones I had at the school overall. On the other hand, none of the classes I had that were run by tenured professors were any good, with one professor even giving us the wrong exam once and having us complete it anyway, even though it had material we weren’t even expected to know.

  • salarua@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    tenure was created to prevent nazi interference with academic freedom. and here we see nazi interference with academic freedom thwarted by tenure

  • leetnewb@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not to downplay the seriousness of the title or claims, but undergraduate enrollment is in a relatively steep decline. It seems to go without saying that faculty members without tenure would be near the top of the list for cuts.

    Side note…did theintercept recently go paywalled? I don’t remember having issues in the past.