• LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The vast majority of the challenges handled in the March hearing that Ramsey attended had been submitted by Frazier, who had challenged about 1,000 people registered at nonresidential addresses, such as P.O. boxes or businesses[.] […] At the meeting, Frazier defended his challenges. “I’m free labor trying to help the system to make sure everyone can vote,” he said. “I’m not trying to suppress anyone. I just want clean voter rolls for a multitude of reasons[.”] […] When Frazier himself was challenged in 2022 for being registered to vote at a business address — he sells vegetables from his farm at his house — he decried it as a “frivolous retaliatory challenge” from someone he himself had challenged.

    Emphasis mine.

    They are always lying. They are always lying. It is always about winning, it is never about principle.

    • GiddyGap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They see how Georgia has changed and continues to change. The Atlanta metro has completely overrun the rest of the state. The GOP has problems in any state with a large, dominant metro area.

  • VenoraTheBarbarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ProPublica was able to determine that a vast majority of the challenges since SB 202 became law — about 89,000 of 100,000 — were submitted by just six right-wing activists…

    Imagine having that much time on your hands… And I get that voting integrity is important, and mayyybe these 6 people actually believe they’re protecting that, but with these numbers its gotta just be fishing and targeting people based on demographics, not evidence.

    A spreadsheet attached to the email identified 13 people allegedly registered to vote at P.O. boxes in Forsyth County… Georgians are supposed to register at residential addresses, except in special circumstances. “Please consider this my request that a hearing be held to determine these voters’ eligibility to vote,” wrote the challenger…

    For instance, it specifically says, “except in special circumstances”, how does this dude know these 13 people didn’t have special circumstances??

    I know voter registration fuckery is the point, but how did they not provide rules regarding what constitutes evidence?? … Well I guess I answered my own question at the beginning, but it’s so frustrating.