NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agotime for a rebrand!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down119
arrow-up164arrow-down1imagetime for a rebrand!lemmy.worldNewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squareNewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoDefinitely curious how the party actively working to ban books and prevent people from expressing themselves artistically in public is supporting free speech.
minus-squareBlamemeta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·1 year agoRemoving a book with graphic illustrations of blowjobs from a high school library is about as sensible as you can get.
minus-squaresocsa@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoSo a teenager can engage in sex, but can’t read about it? Do I have that correct?
Definitely curious how the party actively working to ban books and prevent people from expressing themselves artistically in public is supporting free speech.
Removing a book with graphic illustrations of blowjobs from a high school library is about as sensible as you can get.
So a teenager can engage in sex, but can’t read about it? Do I have that correct?
Minors can’t consent.