• IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Similar to Israel telling Palestinians that they can’t have a state “right now” and have to come to “agreeable” terms first.

    If there is no term given it means permanently.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      But they did “give the terms”: they are not in good standing right now, and when the disciplinary action is complete then a final decision will be made.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          It might be technically correct because bar does not necessarily mean permanently, but it implies that, and your claim that it means permanent is definitely false, especially if you’re basing it on the logic you used to claim it’s permanent.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Technically are permanently barred unless overturned.

              The articles notes that they are not in good standing because they are in the process of disciplinary action. So considering this is not a ruling against them that needs to be overturned. If you have some kind of evidence otherwise, I would like to see it.