• plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 months ago

    It will be probably more. I talked with sysadmin from some smaller provider in my country few months ago. And he told me that the migration will take them for most systems about 2 years (depreciation of hardware) and for some machines about 5 years.

    So lot of customers are in process of replacing it but it will take multiple years.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wouldn’t be afraid to use Proxmox for small and middle size business. It’s solid and based on solid, opensource tech. As long as people make sure they get paid, I’m sure they’ll get even better.

        Good on you for making sure your clients pay for support, that’s how opensource thrives.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s the point. Broadcom focuses on only the top consumers and desire everyone else to go away. They then focus only on what those top consumers want and their support staff can be cut down considerably.

        It’s an interesting tactic that they have mastered.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Eventually even those customers will look at alternatives too if there’s only like 50 companies worldwide using it.

          • JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yeah, this is one scenario where the principles in F2P games like MOBAs applies to the business world. Focusing only on the top X companies and losing that market share has a cascading effect where it’s harder to find competent administrators, it’s harder for those administrators to find support online (which then means they have to call for the support they pay for - which while good in the short term for VMWare, is frustrating for the customer, and means that the extra money they’re charging has to partially be used to cover techs to provide said report). The little fish in a market like this help to provide what is essentially free troubleshooting online via stack overflow etc. And giving that market share to competitors gives them the cash flow and experience to build a support system online and improve their product, and then win over the big fish.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      I used to work for a company that made software built on VMware. The biggest customer was using hundreds of thousands of VMs. Pretty sure they’re working on moving off VMware now because of all this bullshit.

      But yeah, it’s gonna take a long time to move off.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      yep, my employer is one of them. Only around 200 VMs but my former employer (an MSP with several hundred customers, among them the administration of the city I live in, all schools, all kindergartens and the church) was also in the process of migrating when I switched.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        My friend who works at an MSP said they’re migrating most of their customers to HyperV, but these are mostly extremely small companies with a dozen or so employees and only a handful of services