• PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah most people don’t care to maintain a local music library. It’s a lot of work and compared to streaming services that do it for you this offers no real benefit. If you listen to lots of new/different music all the time, streaming is actually far cheaper.

    • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      For me, discovery is the entire reason to use streaming services. I have a ton of hard drive space, and know how to find anything I want to download. I have a fairly large music collection from before the days of streaming. But streaming services help me discover all kinds of things I’d likely never hear otherwise. They still suck, as in they’re greedy as hell and the quality is mid, but I don’t know what I’d do if I had to listen to the same stuff all the time.

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s cheaper because the band doesn’t get paid as much. The streaming service keeps most of the meager pay.

      • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        People make up for it by buying merch or going to shows. Margins on those things are much better for the artists.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        In every service I know of, the platform takes a minority of revenue