Imagine seeing someone want to display colors to show other human beings that they are seen and loved…
… then reacting to that with irrational anger. Wanting everyone who displays these supporting colors to be fired from their jobs and vulnerable to homelessness.
Imagine what kind of person does that.
The kind of person who down voted your post, apparently.
I have a kite from the 90s that is a rainbow because I liked the color spectrum as a kid. If some jackass says I’m flying pride colors, then it will be a pride kite.
I bought my nephew a rainbow puzzle for Christmas, not because of any reason other than he likes puzzles and it would help him learn colors, my stepfather saw the rainbow and it looked like someone had pissed in his cheerios.
It was unintentional and completely GLORIOUS
I really do wish we had to imagine them, but we don’t. I see these motherfuckers every day, and some of them are family. I’m extremely disappointed that this type of propaganda is able to work.
Please vote people who are not trying to gut our education programs even further, our entire way of life depends on it.
Bigoted patrons. I guarantee NPS didn’t come to the decision unprompted. They just want visitors to be respectful of nature and one another.
For anyone wondering why NPS or any federal agency might participate in external events or allow employees to attend events in uniform: LGBTQ+ is one of several areas of special emphasis for federal agencies in recruitment, retention, and awareness. Others include, for example, women in government; Asian, Black, Native American, or Hispanic heritage; and people with disabilities. Special Emphasis Programs (SEP) are codified by executive order. The major intents are to dispel stereotypes, promote inclusion, and recognize the advances made by and contributions of people belonging to these groups.
As an example of the kind of participation agencies have shown under SEPs in the past—a local office may attend and set up a booth at a career fair for a Historically Black College or University. This serves employment-related outreach efforts under the SEP for the agency while also observing and recognizing this group. There is no similar Big Gay Hiring Event at a large scale, so Pride participation makes sense to further efforts under this SEP. Even apart from recruitment, the recognition of LGBTQ+ individuals—which NPS already explicitly supports through their management of Stonewall National Monument—and outward displays of inclusion for this group are equally important for prospective and current employees, as part of the culture of the agency.
What NPS has done is allow requests to participate in local Pride events as a form of observance and outreach to languish on the desks of NPS leadership.
My wife briefly interned with the parks service. At least in the late 00s they didn’t let employees go to liquor stores in uniform or even park an NPS vehicle outside one. So I wasn’t surprised when the mandate was issued, but I’m equally unsurprised it was swiftly dropped.
Yeah. I work in a job tangentially related to the federal government, and we’re continually reminded not to engage in anything that might imply affiliation or endorsement. I’m glad NPS is supporting LGBTQ+ causes, but I’m not sure why they get a pass on participating in uniform.
I think everyone is reading this as NPS not allowing Jane Employee to show up in uniform at Pride and hang out. Maybe they’d frown on that. But what appears to be happening is that employees are petitioning to march in Pride parades, or otherwise somehow participate, as they have in years past, and which supports the LGBTQ+ Special Emphasis Program of federal agencies, and NPS is letting those requests sit.
They had those restrictions but they also actively encouraged people to go to SF pride in uniforms, so this was a decision they were making for years that was suddenly reversed. It was surprising this mandate was issued because of the years-long tradition of NPS participation, in uniform, sanctioned by NPS, at pride.
Wait, are you equating the appearance of drinking on the job with supporting LGBTQ+?
No, they are saying you can’t do certain things in uniform, because whether intentional or not anything you do in the uniform can be seen as representative of the uniform approving of it.
Hell when I worked at McDonald’s, if you wanted to smoke you had to cover up the logo somehow.
The effect was that a bunch of people outside with a piece of duct tape on their very obvious McDonald’s uniform smoking, but whatever.
There just commenting on restrictions against personal activities in official uniforms. I’ve had jobs that have had very restrictive uniform policies that basically restricted to coming from or going to work-home. Or even you’re only allowed to be in uniform 30 minutes before or after a shift.
Beyond limiting wear on uniforms organizations general don’t want to be associated with what every employer does in their free time. And they do this with broad policies that may even prevent things they would want, like wearing one at a LGBT rally.
They totally did. Not sure why you’re being down voted other than bigotry.
Supporting equal rights is American. At least, the America I want to live in anyways.
deleted by creator
