Also, interesting comment I found on HackerNews (HN):

This post was definitely demoted by HN. It stayed in the first position for less than 5 minutes and, as it quickly gathered upvotes, it jumped straight into 24th and quickly fell off the first page as it got 200 or so more points in less than an hour.

I’m 80% confident HN tried to hide this link. It’s the fastest downhill I’ve noticed on here, and I’ve been lurking and commenting for longer than 10 years.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now they’re getting $0 and bad press, so no I don’t think they did.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      $0 is better than having a customer whose costs exceed their revenue; it looks like the bad press is being managed; and also fuck online casinos very much.

      • FederatedSaint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just because you don’t like online casinos, doesn’t mean cloudflare didn’t completely fuck this up. They could have negotiated reasonable terms to increase their revenue on this account instead of going the route of stonewalling and extortion.

        So not only did they lose this customer, but this bad press will ensure a lot of others never sign up with them, potentially costing them millions in foregone sales.

        Yeah this was a massive boondoggle…

          • FederatedSaint@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If they’re charging $120,000 per client, it only takes 17 potential lost customers to constitute “millions.” It’s realistic that at least 17 companies might be put-off with the way this was handled.