I’ve heard this claim before that it is not possible for atheists to have “objective moral beliefs” because many moral claims are based on religious authority, which atheists do not believe in.

Thus atheists are subjectivists when it comes to morality: each atheist may disagree with the other about what is moral. Obviously this opens atheists up to problems of disagreements, with some who might believe very conventionally “immoral” things are acceptable for them.

This is not of course to say that atheists may not choose to live lives that are some what “moral” (moral, as is often defined by religions)

So, what’s the status of the idea of “objective morality” and atheism?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    its a dead end conversation. we have a base morality as defined by the zeitgeist. thats it. if you require some religious moral authority to act appropriately in our society you are broken .

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Super easy:

    Murder is wrong because I don’t have the right to deprive someone of their life.

    Theft is wrong because I don’t have the right to goods or services which I did not earn.

    I could go on, but there’s no need to bring imaginary beings into morality. In fact, the least moral people appear to be religious.

    • amzd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you’re reading this and agree please take the next logical step.

      Animal slaughter is wrong because I don’t have the right to deprive someone of their life.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Animals aren’t “someone” and eating other animals is, and has been, part of the natural order of things since animals have existed.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Because God says so” isn’t an objective basis - it’s a subjective basis in which the entity making the subjective appraisal has been elevated to a purportedly ultimate position.

    The difference between “because God says so” and “because Jeff who lives down the street says so” isn’t one of kind, but merely one of (supposed) degree. God is simply treated as a more aithoritative source than Jeff, but that doesn’t somehow elevate God’s assertions to objectivity.