• u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      *8.1

      Due to the optimizations Windows 8.1 is my favorite Windows version. When I compared it to Linux Mint 21 Cinnamon on my old (now dead) laptop, it performed slightly faster. It also somehow beat Windows XP which is what that thing was made for. Although a part of that could have been that half of the drivers only worked in XP, so it had more to load.

      Maybe if they properly called it Windows 9, it would have caught on. It was definitely different enough from 8.

        • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yup. Boot time and loading of system apps. 8.1 was basically instant while XP and Mint had slight delay. Not a big deal though, just something interesting for being Windows. After all, it was made for tablets.

          I also put Windows 11 on it despite being unsupported. That was slower, but still OK-ish with SSD. Definitely nowhere near Linux Mint though. The background processes were just killing the CPU. Thankfully, thanks to being made in 2007 the cooler could easily take 100% CPU usage. However, it would hover around just 6% with network disconnected. Hmmm…
          The CPU was Core 2 Duo T7500 upgraded from T7100. I got it on AliExpress for €1. It seems some people were using them for… making keychains? Anyway, they were sold as functional.

          I wish laptop CPUs and GPUs were still upgradable. The GPU was GeForce 8600M.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe if they properly called it Windows 9, it would have caught on.

        “Windows 9” was a no-go due to lazy programmers. Could have gone with “Windows Nine” though, which would have brought the naming in line with “Xbox One”

  • smokinliver@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thats fuckin amazing.

    I can still remember when we celebrated linux being at 0.8% and it was not long ago.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    Looks like GoL has a plot over time. Linux adoption is starting to hockey stick, definitely above linear growth, this is getting exciting! I would guess, if it hits somewhere around 5-10% and keeps this hockey stick shape, we’ll really start to see the game industry justify giving it more attention.

    This will come with both good and bad, I expect it’s only a matter of time before some game tries a native kernel level anti-cheat, aka root kit, on Linux.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    It seems comedic but I would imagine when one in 50 of your users falls into a certain cohort you start to consider them in your designs.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      And that’s the most naïve way of looking at it. With more data you may be able to see if Linux users favour certain genres of games over others, so the number may be a lot higher than 2% for your game in particular.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      There were some reports from game devs who said that the big reports from Linux users was worth it just for that.

      https://playingtux.com/articles/developers-dv-rings-saturn-very-satisfied-bug-reports-linux-users?lang=en

      He actually pulled together stats for it all, and it was 5.8% sales making 38% of the big reports, which tended to be high quality.
      So from his experience as an independent game dev, he said it was worth it just for the QA you get out of it.

      I think a lot of the libraries and tooling being updated to be more platform agnostic helps too. It’s not “press button to support Linux”, but it’s getting a lot easier than needing to rewrite your engine for every platform.

  • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    More than 50% of people are using Win10 and M$ are about to stop supporting it. That’s trouble brewing.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No it is not. MS stopping 10 support early sucks, but the average user doesn’t know or care.

      For reference, by the same point in Win10’s lifetime, 40% of users were still on Win 7, and by the time they stopped Win7 support it was 20% still. Phone manufacturers advertising ongoing software support has made this a bit more relevant or prominent, but most PC users will only update as their OS tells them to, and if the OS goes silent they’ll just keep chugging along. We know this, it’s how it’s been forever. “People still on Windows 7” was a bit of a meme even at the time.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, that works, too. The reason I went with 7 is that it’s well covered in the portion of the Steam survey one can easily check, but this type of lackadaisical transition leading to an increasingly frustrated Microsoft is such a staple of Windows history in general.

      • fschaupp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        This.

        The first time users start to change OS is when Chrome or Steam doesn’t work because of the unsupported OS version.

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Impressed by all the folks on Win7 and 8.

    Also surprised to see double the MacOS users

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      One of my old boxes is still win7. I’m never upgrading it and I keep it as a media thingo. I have an xp box in the garage somewhere, but I may have cannibalized the parts at some point. I’m pretty sure it works.

  • Vincente@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    OK. The share of SteamOS within the Linux OS has increased by 3%.

    So the amount of the active steam decks per month is about

    0.4534 *2.32 *0.01 *150000000 ≈ 1,577,832

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you look into the data Steam OS Holo s listed and it is 45.3%. Arch separately is second at 7.9% and then third is the Flatpak installs across all Linux versions at 6%.

      The changes are more difficult to interpret as Linux is growing overall so changes between Linux distros are difficult. For example a small decline in overall share may still represent an increase in total numbers. While Steam OS is up another 3% points, other distros combined are up more - Ubuntu and PopOS combined are up 5% points. That suggests the Linux growth is split between Steam Deck and PC users rather than purely one or the other dominating.

    • HaikuFaiter@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      @Vincente @mr_MADAFAKA I think no, it’s not. If you go into Steam statistics and ask to only show the results per OS, you can see the statistics only for Linux. There you can see how much of each Linux distro is being used. Arc is not the first.

  • TrudeauCastroson [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m surprised Arch is that high compared to other distros.

    Also interesting that people are actually switching to windows 11, everyone I know is staying on win10 as long as possible because they’re more used to the interface.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      One of the things that got me to change my gaming desktop from Mint to Arch was the fact that you get the cutting-edge version of everything; kernel and amdgpu being the most important, but also getting the latest version of Lutris and things is nice too. Brought me from “usually about 50 fps outdoors in Elden Ring” to “usually about 60 fps” on the same machine.

      Makes sense for a gaming machine to only include the services you actually want, which Arch enables. Supports my hardware better too - my audio gear works perfectly in Pipewire but is ropey in ALSA, so rather than “install Mint -> install Pipewire -> remove ALSA -> hope ALSA is gone”, the sequence is “install Arch -> install Pipewire”, which make more sense.

      Other cutting-edge rolling release distros are available, of course, but once you learn Arch, it makes a lot of sense for gaming.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        BTW: ALSA is never gone. It’s the kernel sound driver. And Pipewire is more or less just a helper. But underneath it all it’s still ALSA.

      • ayaya@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t forget the AUR. It’s so much easier to use yay than it is to go to GitHub to manually check for updates/download/install a deb or rpm file.

        • TeddyKila [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          AUR is reposnsible for the vast majority of -Syu into softbricks, and is little better than downloading random binaries (because you literally are most of the time)

          • ta00000 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s what timeshift and btrfs is for! Really though it takes like ten seconds to roll back and each snapshot only takes like 40mb. There’s a pacman hook to take a snapshot before updating.

            AUR is just incredibly convenient for me. I don’t have to think about it, I don’t have to track anything down.