• FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone who exclusively ate meat for some reason who moved to chicken would have a greater impact than someone who exclusively ate chicken and went vegan.

    But that first person could have an even bigger environmental impact by becoming Vegan instead of only eating chicken.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes but if you actually convince someone who eats just chicken to go vegan it will have less of an effect if you actually convince a big red meat eater to limit to chicken.

      • r1veRRR@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, and if we could only do one, we should choose accordingly. We can do both, simultanously. Exactly like how we don’t have to choose between eating less meat and driving less cars.

      • CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, however, not realistic in some parts of the world. For instance, in the United States, Republicans have waged a war on bodily autonomy, which includes the Roe v. Wade ruling and states creating departments to hunt down citizens who go out of state to have abortions. There are also countries where sex education is not prohibited. So, take these things into consideration while thinking about potential solutions. That being said, you are right, and you can do something about it by voting, if you are able to, wherever you live.