• JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yea but Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do. It’s not necessarily religion in total, it’s that the current dominant religions are extremely controlling and more about self-oppression for eventual reward than guidelines for a good life like most pagan sects

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Greco-Roman paganism didn’t treat women as owned property of men like the Abrahamic faiths do

      Yes they fucking did lmao. Greek women had absolutely no rights

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      right, which means it isn’t “religion” as a concept which is the problem.

      Also, sexuality is pretty commonly open in Hinduism, which is a pretty huge current religion.

      It isn’t a problem with “religion”.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I was going to say, isn’t the Kama Sutra a Hindu text? We have a bunch of sex positions that may have been lost to time if it weren’t for the Hindu religion.