• whereisk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    He had knowledge and connections to the upper echelons and he couldn’t make it, and when health concerns arose he went back to his money because it sucks to be working poor and in need of medical assistance.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      6 months ago

      He also didn’t have the stress that would come from actual failure with no money.

      Bankruptcy, homelessness and real poverty fuck up your ability to succeed in a vastly underrated way.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly. The calculus for taking risks is vastly different when there’s a safety net. You can treat it as a game and go all in.

        On the other hand if there’s even a small chance of losing housing or getting in legal trouble or your family being destitute you take no risks - if you are a person with a sense of responsibility that is.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yup, or you take maybe a couple risks in a lifetime, but if they don’t pan out you suffer from them for years as you go back to stability and try to regain what little of a toehold on a good life you might have had.

          The very real lesson for the poor is “don’t try,” especially if you have dependents. You’ll be knocked back harder than you can imagine.

          These mfs don’t know what it’s like to see loved ones start losing teeth because you made a failed push and now you’re paying it back with interest.

          • whereisk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can see how this structure favours the most sociopathic members of society, as they are the ones that will take more risks without regard for others.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        His father got cancer during the experiment. He considered ending it then, but he continued with the experiment.

        Imagine having that sort of choice. He didn’t have to skip work to take his dad to appointments. He didn’t have to eat ramen to afford chemo. It was only when his own health was at risk that he pulled the plug.

        Imagine a world where everybody had that sort of safety net. Just like, “Nope, shit’s too hard.”

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        For most people, it’s easier to become homeless than it is for the homeless to extricate themselves from it.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Even the stress of worrying about money. Yeah you can take out a loan for your risky business venture when you know you won’t have to worry about paying it back. Yeah, you can couch surf for a while when you aren’t staring down the next few decades of your life.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right, those 62k he did earn would have been gone and him probably homeless as soon as his health issues got worse. It’s a reality for a lot of Americans. Also those 62k he earned were thanks to all the education and experience he was able to get thanks to his privilege. Most people aren’t fortunate enough to have his level of education and experience to help them even get to 62k. I make 25 percent less than that and still feel fortunate of where I got to since I came from absolutely nothing.