• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    CEO would probably have to sign off on replacing the CEO. Or the shareholders could vote them out but that’s just as unlikely at any big company…CEOs have a lot of money and shareholders like rich people

    • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Board of directors would replace the ceo. AI doesn’t have a risk of sexual harassment lawsuits or the need of a golden parachute. That sort of risk assessment equals real dollars for a board. There are already a few companies that have AI CEOs. This will most likely become common

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean there’s also just the sheer financial savings of not having to pay an exorbitant CEO salary and package as well. That’s massive savings, and the company gets an office back to give to someone who needs it. There’s seriously no downsides for boards of directors to keep replacing CEOs with algorithms.

        • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I can’t imagine “AI CEO” is free. Assuming there is a cost parallel of salary to AI subscription. The savings is in the risk/lawsuits etc.

          • Instigate@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I was imagining a one-off cost, but you’ve very likely right in that any software like this will be subscription-based. I guess my point still stands RE: salary package - while the base salary might end up being similar, you don’t have to pay an AI bonuses or any other tax avoidance crap like a company car etc.