• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    But it was done, which is kind of the opposite of NIMBY. Also it’s not a project that could go anywhere, except that no one wants it.

    Closing Guantanamo was a NIMBY thing because, while everyone agrees it should happen, no one wanted the detainees in their backyard. (As ridiculous as that is.)

    • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Panama canal was a US NIMBY project I’d argue. Give us the canal but without impacting our territory.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Your comment is actually insane.

        There is no way the US would not have preferred the canal to be in their backyard.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        We didn’t maintain administration of the canal for just over a century for no reason. We would have put that shit in the Rio Grande, if we could have. Unfortunately that river runs dry for several months a year.

        Especially since that particular area of the world is some of the least developed.