I think there’s a meaningful difference in that the colonization of Palestine is so recent. All the examples you give are from over a hundred to several hundred years ago, and so much time has passed that addressing the damage becomes more complex. Living Palestinians have been kicked out of their homes by colonizers and could be returned to them, whereas the brunt of land and property theft against Native Americans for example was already done by the start of the 20th century. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth addressing or impossible to address, just that it’d look different.

Like I said, I don’t hold the stance myself, I was just pointing out that its not necessarily a race thing. I think having these stances is a lot more realistic for a smaller, more recently established nation such as Israel, in contrast to the Americas.

Personally I think, as people have said, a multi-ethnic single state with laws, regulations, and trials with real consequences in place to prevent this kind of thing from happening ever again is ideal. Call it Palestine.

There is also an active settler movement in the West Bank, in the process of commuting violence against Palestinians with the express purpose of occupying their homes and land.

I’m really not trying to do a “gatcha”

put more money time in the posting machine, and it spits out tokens responses to your posts that are sometimes repetitive and not quite the exact one you’re looking for, so it reinforces a strong behavior pattern… fun game!