Exclusive: Mozilla reverses course, re-lists extensions it removed in Russia – OSnews
www.osnews.com

In alignment with our commitment to an open and accessible internet, Mozilla will reinstate previously restricted listings in Russia. Our initial decision to temporarily restrict these listings was made while we considered the regulatory environment in Russia and the potential risk to our community and staff.

  • averyminya@beehaw.org
    21·
    5 months ago

    The damage is done since people will critique Mozilla for anything that isn’t snuffing Google.

    I’m glad they reversed the decision.

    • 30p87@feddit.de
      13·
      5 months ago

      They were forced to delist it temporarily in Russia. The fact that they listed it again tells me that they listen to the community, like they claimed, and that they value said community above the russian government.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        4·
        5 months ago

        Well, they listen to the community when what the community is pointing out is a very obvious mistake which has a very high probability of causing a whole lot of bad press, at least.

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      2·
      5 months ago

      Such an abrupt reversal is puzzling. Did they think Firefox users don’t care?

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    12·
    5 months ago

    [Off-topic] As I was reading the comments from a related thread, I noticed that the comments there can be tagged by the community. (See Alfman’s comment, being tagged as “verbose”). That would be an amazing feature here in the Fediverse forums/link-sharers.

    [On-topic] I wonder if Mozilla was buying time to retract its staff from Russia? Even if not, I respect their ability to revert a decision in a transparent way, and apologise to the community without sounding like a corporate “apology”. It shows that they actually care about the principles that they’re babbling about, even if they violated them with the temporary removal.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      5·
      5 months ago

      Re your off-topic aside, it looks more like that user has been tagged as verbose (whether that mean long comments or a high volume of posts isn’t clear).

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        5·
        5 months ago

        Yup, you’re right - the tag is for the user, not the comment as I incorrectly said.

        Either way it would be a neat feature IMO. (I’d be probably among the first being tagged “verbose”, but I’m OK with this - other people could be tagged as “informative”, “fun” etc.)