Indiana and Kentucky lose access in the coming weeks.

  • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    5 months ago

    There was talk at one point of them releasing the viewing habits of politicians based on metrics they had collected….i wish they would have

      • Vox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Never, they’ll do what they always do, make laws in a fashion that only applies to the lawmakers

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Golly, if only there was a way to appear as if I were in a different location… a network of tunnels that I could travel through… like a very fast mole…

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    the fact that they can comfortably afford to just dump multiple entire states’ worth of customers just shows how mountainous the piles of cash they’re raking in are

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The laws generally require adults to upload some form of government ID

    Absolutely insane, KYC for looking at pornography

  • Black_Mald_Futures [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I love how they have some preachy bullshit telling me to vote unlike all the other websites which either 1) let you verify or 2) are ignoring the law

    • toastboy79@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      so we’re just going to ignore the porn done by female presenting creators that they themselves do because they want and like to?

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So because some women do it for themselves it makes it okay for the ones that are abused? is that the argument you’re presenting here?
        be clear.

        • toastboy79@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Absolutely not. Clear enough?

          What I’m suggesting is that just because some people are abused doesn’t mean we need to dismantle the whole damn thing. We need to fix the problems present while acknowledging and encouraging the positives in it.

            • toastboy79@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              No worries, I enjoy that people seen to actually talk and discuss here so I’m glad to add to it