• Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Iirc trees aren’t a cladistic group; “tree” is a word that describes a phenotype. Bananas absolutely grow on trees because “a tree-like herb” is a tree.

    Edit: adding salt to water does change the boiling point. The amount is simply not enough to be significant most of the time. Similarly, the coriolis effect does affect the movement of water in toilets, just not enough to be noticeable.

    Edit2: multi-personality disorder isn’t a thing. Disassociative Identity Disorder (DID) is what’s being referenced.

    • Pohl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      A pretty good number of these are just pointing out differences between colloquial language and specific language.

      Botanical language is useful for botanists to communicate with each other but I’m not putting tomatoes in the fruit salad. Thinking of tomatoes as veggies in your kitchen isn’t some MYTH! Calling a tall plant a tree is useful for you and I to communicate. That does not mean we are deceived or attempting to undermine the work of our botany friends.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Palm “trees” are a type of grass. That one fucks with me.

      The coriolis force affects water in toilets, but about a thousandth as much as the shape of the toilet/the way water enters the bowl.

      • BakerBagel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        An oak tree is more closely related to corn and wheat than it is to a pine tree. Coelacanths are more closly related to whales than they are to tunas. Biology gets weird man.