• HurkieDrubman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    American cars having their brake lights and turn signals be the same light is stupid and dangerous.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 days ago

    When changing lanes or turning you are supposed to use the turning signal before doing the manouver. The turning signal is supposed to warn other drivers that you are going to do something. It doesn’t make any sense to use the turning signal when already mid-turning or while already changing lanes. Many drivers don’t seem to know that.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Things you will need to operate while driving your car shouldn’t have touch screen controls.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    That we’d all be better off if we accepted our own fallibility. That we are not perfect little robots, and as a result more tolerance and forgiveness in the world is necessary.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here’s one that’s not as consequential as other posts here. It’s not going to change the world, but would make things slightly better.

    Split lock washers are worse than useless. They’re supposed to be a spring against the bolt to help resist it turning back out over time. They don’t. If anything, they make it worse.

    Here’s a NASA publication on fastener design (because of course there’s a NASA publication on fastener design): https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424

    The lockwasher serves as a spring while the bolt is being tightened. However, the washer is normally flat by the time the bolt is fully torqued. At this time it is equivalent to a solid flat washer, and its locking ability is nonexistent. In summary, a Iockwasher of this type is useless for locking.

    This was published in 1990, but we’re still using this shit. Stop. There are many other kinds of fastener locking that work, like nylon locking nuts or threadlock, and we don’t need these.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That documentation is supposed to explain how a thing works to people who don’t know how it works. I know, sounds extremely obvious, but you’d be surprised how much documentation out there is written in a way, expecting you to already know what it’s talking about. No. I do not. It is the documentation’s job to explain ME what IT is talking about…

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    That other than a niche we specialize in, we’re pretty fucking dumb at everything else.

  • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “Homeopathic” does not mean organic, or good for you, natural, wholesome, effective, or inherently safe to consume.

    It is, in fact, a code word for no active ingredient.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The spices at the grocery store I’ve been going to for the past 25 years has had the spices alphabetized this entire time.

    Edit, I misread the question but I’m not fixing my response

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 days ago

    How corporations use advertisements to influence how the media reports on their activities. Prime example is how BP ran all those “We’re Sorry” ads when they poisoned the Gulf of Mexico. They weren’t apologizing to the public. They were using the ads to pass bribes to the news agencies to make sure to give them soft coverage when they should have been ranking them over the coals.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    That you need to wash your hands after going to the bathroom. I’ve seen too many grown men walk straight out of the restroom after urinating.

      • TehBamski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Listen, ‘Stoner Rick’… not everything you think and say is mindblown, earth-shaking facts or perspectives. And this is coming for a dude who used to get high and once thought that I and my friends (who were not high,) were in an atom accelerator going down the highway. My mind was blown away but everyone in the car thought It was a dumb thing to say.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trans woman here, I’ve seen both sides.

      A small percentage of the men’s room washes their hands and a small percentage of the women’s room DOESN’T wash their hands. It’s a night and day difference.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I mean, decades of using one? And the mockery I received by men I got for washing my own hands? I have had family members and numerous classmates tell me that washing your hands is just admitting you peed on them.

          Of course my experiences are anctedotal, but for me, it was a quite noticeable difference when I started using the ladies room. I’m not trying to make a definitive statement, absolutely there are men who do reguarly wash their hands, but there is also a very large majority of men who don’t. From my experience, that’s not the case with people in the women’s room.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean, decades of using one?

            I said where. What part of the world do you live in? I’ve lived mostly in the USA, and most of the public bathrooms I’ve used have been at restaurants, museums, bars, and gyms.

            In those places, it’s rare to see a man leave the bathroom without washing his hands.

            So where did you see that?

            • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              US, lived mostly up and down the west coast.

              restaurants, museums, bars, and gyms.

              And these are literally the examples I would’ve given. To be fair, it’s been years since I’ve been in a mens room. But, I know it’s common for most guys to walk straight out.

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s wild. Maybe I’m not observant but I haven’t ever seen someone leave the bathroom without washing their hands

      • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Is this the real reason why we have longer lines in the bathroom? In addition to having to finagle several layers just to pee?

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Every time I see one of those “employees must wash hands” signs, I think about getting some custom made “and everyone else should too” signs made up to start posting below them in public bathrooms everywhere I go.

    • JimmyChanga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wish it was only after urinating that I’d seen my fellow man just walk straight out of the toilet, beyond disgusting.

    • tamal3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh i know people who drink their own urine, I’m not that worried about pee. I don’t want to drink my own pee, let alone a stranger’s pee, but I’m more concerned about the shit in shit when taking about hand washing.

      What % of kitchen sponges in the US were found to contain fecal matter? I don’t remember, but it was high enough for me to switch to Swedish dish clothes immediately. Eurgh.

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          A whole bunch of friends from the town I used to live in. One started peeing on his skin as an eczema treatment, which seemed to work, and somehow this progressed to drinking it. It spread, and became a thing in town. Last I heard there were about 10 pee drinkers, but obviously it’s not something people talk about openly.

          Apparently morning pee is relaxing because of the melatonin content?

          Edit: Apparently it’s a very old and widespread practice. Here’s a Healthline article on it: https://www.healthline.com/health/drinking-urine

      • Tyoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 days ago

        In the very first episode of House M.D. we establish that House washes both before and after.

        We then watch him go to the bathroom at least a dozen times throughout the series, and not once does he wash before. Worst. Series. Ever.

      • TehBamski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not interested in getting your ‘pickle juice’ on my hands. I don’t care if you washed your hands before. ‘Pickle juice’ splashback happens when you’ve got your hand down there. So wash after the fact, Jack.

    • Technological_Elite@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Same here. Was out with my mother and brother once, went to a fast food restaurant, grabbed some shakes. Well, we happened to go inside and use the restroom, and so did an employee.

      My brother witnessed that the employee did not wash his hands, annnnnd they made our shakes.

      We didn’t want to make a scene, we just didn’t drink them, fuck that shit.

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This grosses me out so much. Some men claim they don’t want to get germs on their penis, and that’s their justification. Just walk straight from the urinal snd leave, or they laughably just splash some water on their hands and leave calling it a day. So fucking gross.

      I’d love to tell those men just how many droplets of urine bounce from the urinal and directly onto the front of their pants, lower shirt, on their arms, and all over their hands and penis. That shit ain’t clean, and you’re putting urine droplets on your face, eyes, and mouth less than 30 minutes later.

      Fucking disgusting.

      Farside_Didnt_Wash_Hands_Comic.PNG

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Some men claim they don’t want to get germs on their penis

        How does that make any sense? What… how… I just… ?! Do they believe one washes their hands BEFORE peeing? Well OK, let’s imagine that, then then would have… cleaner hands so… less germs? Do they imagine that one “reverse wash” theirs hands before? Like… rubbing their hands on the floor itself THEN pee? It makes absolutely 0 sense. I don’t get any of it.

    • єχтяαναgαηтєηzумє@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, urine is sterile, and if only touch the door in and out of the bathroom, washing doesn’t always seem necessary. If you get pee on your hands, then by all means. But if the only option is air blades for hand drying, you’re better off not washing. Those literally lace your hands in fecal matter when used in a public restroom.

      • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        Urine isn’t sterile. While it’s true that paper towels are better than dryers, drying your hands (even with a dryer) is better than not drying. Washing your hands is, obviously, better than not washing your hands.

        If you don’t wash your hands you’re already in the worst case. It makes no sense to complain about the methods of drying available.

        • Reucnalts@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Drying with air blower is better than not drying? Mhh but its not like that washing without drying is worse than not washing? Yeah i mean bacteria like wet areas but i dont see the point that drying is they key point about the hygiene. I sweat a lot and my hands take a big part of it. So even after drying they get wet really fast, so i think the most important part is Soap. These little mafuckers love it wet but more they hate it if its alcaline. So dont save up on the Soap :)

        • єχтяαναgαηтєηzумє@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          Other peoples fecal matter will contain many forigen bacteria, and these microbes are proven to coat the hands of people after using air driers. My apologies about the sterile urine comment. Nonetheless, you’d be in a better situation with bacteria on your hands from your own pee vs from a strangers feces. One’s apart of your microbiota, while the other is entirely foreign. IDK, I’ve seen many cases where washing your hands after a piss made no sense due to cleanliness issues or a lack of a sink and never heard anyone around ever having any issues. Yet many pathogens are spread via the fecal oral route. So I’ll take my chances of maybe having some of my urine vs having someone else shit on my hands everytime in that situation.

          • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m not sure I follow your logic here. You believe you’ll come into contact with other people’s piss and shit less often when people don’t wash their hands?

            • єχтяαναgαηтєηzумє@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              Air hand driers cover your hands in other peoples fecal matter. That’s a massive biological risk, especially with how many pathogens are transmitted from poop to mouth. Using a urinal will most often result in no backsplash, keeping my hands pretty clean. To wash off that minor, if any, urine which got on my hands and end with others poop on my hands from the air drier has put me in a much worse position. That’s all I’m saying, is there’s 100% situations where washing you hands makes no sense after a piss. But it’s good practice for sure, unless an air drier is involved.

              • scutiger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Using a urinal will most often result in no backsplash, keeping my hands pretty clean.

                Using a urinal definitely results in backsplash, and because your hands and body are right in front of it, there’s even less likelihood of avoiding it vs a toilet. Just because you don’t see or feel it, doesn’t mean it’s not there.

      • snf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        urine is sterile

        Not by the time it exits your body, no. Urine is sterile when it leaves the bladder, but it picks up bacteria on its way through the urethra

        • єχтяαναgαηтєηzумє@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I told folks to start buying masks in March 2020 and found a new gig as the one I had didn’t enforce any mask requirements. But I’m also a backpacker who knows bacteria and the immune system pretty well. I don’t read much research on urine, so again, please forgive that oversight. But funny how people aren’t easily categorized, ah?

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            So you only trust science sometimes? There are contradictions on whether air dryers are more or less hygienic than paper towels. But there’s no contradictions on whether you should wash your hands.

            • єχтяαναgαηтєηzумє@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              This study from the American Society of Microbiology specifically demonstrates how air driers at least add 3 bacterial colonies, and up to 254 colonies, when using an air drier in a public restroom: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/aem.00044-18. In addition, a Harvard review of the research also identifies that the chances of picking up a serious pathogen in the bathroom are quite small.

              So, having little chance in general yet using the air drier, which has shown to add bacteria to your hands in every single test, doesn’t make sense after understanding this data. I’m a man of science, and this involves assessing all available data regarding the topic at hand. This being the case, the data provided above highlights how just not touching your face and washing your hands at the next opportunity after leaving a bathroom with only hand driers is the most logical move. But to each their own, I know microbiologist and virologist who are much smarter than I that refuse to use air driers, so I took note and make moves accordingly.

              • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                There are two important quotes I would like to point out from that paper:

                It is certainly clear that hand washing can reduce the risk of infections (39). However, the deposition of potentially pathogenic bacteria on the hands after hand washing to remove transient floras reduces the effectiveness of hand washing

                Note the wording: “reduces effectiveness” means you should still do it, it is still effective, just less so.

                These results did not differ significantly from those for bacterial colonies deposited by hand dryers from the same bathrooms when calculations of the colonies deposited by hand dryers and small fans were corrected for the times for air exposure and rates of airflow from these two sources

                In other words: moving the air around is the cause, so a bathroom with paper towels that also has an air conditioner or fan will produce similar results. You know what else moves air around similar to a small fan? You when walking around, your hands are moving air and contacting lots of it.

                I could reply with a study that finds air dryers to be safer and filter more bacteria, and we could go back and forth until one of us grows tired. Instead I’ll leave you with a review of several papers published on the matter where you can see that it’s not so clear cut, there is discussion around it and it doesn’t help that the vast majority of papers out there are financed by either paper companies or air drying companies (btw, kudos for citing one of the independently financed studies)

                https://academic.oup.com/jambio/article/130/1/25/6726080

                If you don’t want to read this, the long story short is that we don’t have enough evidence to conclude whether they are more or less hygienic:

                The second question we sought to answer is ‘Are PT safer than hand dryers relative to human infection risks?’ We found no data to support any human health claims relative to hand dryers vs PT use.

                And finally I leave you with another quote from this paper:

                Of notable importance is the need to evaluate risks from hand‐drying activities in consideration of handwashing scenarios, given that the greatest uncertainty in hand contamination is associated with the handwashing method, and not the drying method.

                In short: not washing your hands is worse than any drying method.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      6 days ago

      For people who don’t know, the theory of chiropractics is that the light of God somehow shines into the human body through the top of the head, travels down the spine, and on through the nerves. If you can just fix any blockages (aka “subluxations”) in that flow then it will be impossible for disease to exist in the body. Because God’s light.

      The founder of chiropractics was told this information by a ghost.

      I know some people swear by chiropractic adjustments, but this is information I wish I’d known when I had my back injury because going to a chiropractor set my recovery back by at least three years. And the money I lost to that quack could have paid for not only the legit physical therapist that actually got me feeling better, but probably a decent massage chair too.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve never heard a chiropractor say that. How do I know what you just claimed about that field isn’t misinformation?

        • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          From the Wikipedia article:

          “Early chiropractors believed that all disease was caused by interruptions in the flow of innate intelligence, a vitalistic nervous energy or life force that represented God’s presence in man; chiropractic leaders often invoked religious imagery and moral traditions. D. D. Palmer said he ‘received chiropractic from the other world’. D. D. and B. J. [Palmer] both seriously considered declaring chiropractic a religion, which might have provided legal protection under the U.S. constitution, but decided against it partly to avoid confusion with Christian Science.”*

          Why would a chiropractor tell you that? Nobody selling you a quack remedy is going to just come out and tell you it’s quack remedy. That’s rule #1 of selling quack remedies. But the history of chiropractics isn’t a secret, Neither are the statistics on vertebral artery dissection and other injuries caused by chiropractic adjustments. But look, I’m not your mommy. You don’t have to believe me, and you’re free to go do what you feel. It’s your own neck you’re risking.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wow, I knew chiropractors were quacks, but I didn’t know it was this bad. Thanks for sharing this; I’m sorry that you didn’t have this information when you most needed it.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think you’ve just reconciled two things:

        1. Internet always says chiropractors are quacks

        2. Multiple reasonable people IRL have praised their own chiropractors

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Someone can praise their chiropractor, in the end that’s anecdotal and then I could point to all the people that have become paralyzed due to chiros.

          All of them are quacks because most of what they do to people is bullshit and potentially harmful, it just happens that they sometimes also do some things that are actually ok but it’s methods employed by an actual medical field.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        My chiro has all his training in physiotherapy. So is he a quack or is he a pro? I’m so confused!

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Are you sure? I’m pretty sure the ghost that taught DD Palmer the art of chiropracticness was totally legit. DD even said the ghost was a doctor, why would you not believe him?!?

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Depends on what you mean by that. PTs can use chiropractic techniques to great effect.

      But there is a MASSIVE difference between an actual PT that sometimes uses specific chiropractic techniques and the con artists who try to shake your down for weekly neck cracks.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    stronger products need less advertising, so an over-advertised product is likely inferior.