• Arotrios
      link
      fedilink
      32
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Upvote for sympathy and understanding. The way the US treats the disabled is fucking criminal. My advice to you as someone who cares for two fully disabled family members is to live as much as you can under the radar. Income is very tricky, as you’re basically forced to work under the table to survive and maintain your benefits - which are nowhere near the cost of living. Never let a savings account get above $2000 (split accounts if need be), and never tell your social workers more about your life than what they need to know to help you.

      Regarding your landlord, use your disability to your advantage. There’s very stringent laws where I am (California) that give additional eviction protections to the disabled - you may be able to use similar laws in your area to keep him off your back. This is one area where your social worker can help - ask specifically for rent assistance and mention constructive eviction given that he’s threatening to kick you out over a two day delay in rent.

    • @toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      289 months ago

      If you’re comfortable saying be it publicly or via dm, let me know what pharmacy you’re going to.

      If it’s one of the ones I support I’m more than willing to kick whine and scream to every management individual I know about it violating our company ethics.

      If it’s not, please consider switching to one of the ones I support. I don’t give a shit about your money, I care about you not getting the shit end of the stick.

        • @toasteecup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m in the technology department for any Kroger brand. If your experience violates the company ethics I’m willing to lose the job to point out violatiom of the ethics.

    • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      My wife is legally disabled and we’re constantly going through that pharmacy crap. It’s criminal how the medical system operates here in California. The runaround with doctors and filling recurring scripts on time never ends. Problem is we have no options. My wife’s medical insurance greatly limits doctor choice and forces us to use a particular pharmacy chain. That should be illegal and is not. Even if that wasn’t the case the pharmacy we’re forced to use (CVS) has established a local monopoly by buying out all competing pharmacies in the area. We’d have to go all the way across town to find a different one.

    • @MartinXYZ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t want to live anymore.

      I know life is tough right now, and it sure sounds like yours is rougher than most. As somebody who’s been struggling a lot, both with finances and healt, lately as well, I can relate somewhat. I know it’s not much of a comfort and kind of a cliche but: when things are as bad as they are now, they can only get better. It sucks waiting while everything sucks, but unfortunately that’s all we can do. Also, look around you. There’s always something to live for, even if it’s just seeing the sunset again or the smell of freshly cut grass. You’re right though, if only money was distributed more evenly and the super rich were taxed fairly, things would be a lot easier for many of us. In the words of the hardcore band Deez Nuts:

      “money can not buy you happiness it’s true what they say, but a motherfucker’s still got bills to pay”

  • HousePanther
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1629 months ago

    What really is upsetting is that Musk has billions with which he can use on a lark. Most of us would consider 100,000 an impossible risk. Billionaires are the problem. I repeat - The problem.

        • Kichae
          link
          fedilink
          159 months ago

          And that would preclude them being billionaires

      • HousePanther
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        “But where is the fun of that?” says Elon Musk probably.

      • mohKohn
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        I mean, as much as I think gates/bezos have abhorrent business practices, they do both have fairly large charitable foundations, and iirc, both have actually built literal hospitals with their money.

      • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        Totally not a setup, lol. Have you ever been in the hospital industry behind the scenes? I bet the Zuck wants access to the people’s data and/or funneling money through it somehow.

          • @Bahalex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            89 months ago

            He didn’t build it, but yea his name is on it because of his money. Not that PR money means he has morals. Although, it is a hospital for real human people, not other lizard types.

          • @itsnotlupus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Yes, it really was renamed after the Zuckerbergs, as buildings sometimes are at the request of a large donator seeking posterity.

            See Wikipedia:

            In November 2008, San Francisco voters approved an $887.4 million general obligation bond for the General Hospital rebuild, work began in 2009, and was expected to be finished in 2015.

            In 2015, Facebook founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and his wife Priscilla Chan gave $75 million to help fund equipment and technology for the new hospital.

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      The rich and powerful have always been the problem for thousands of years. Somehow, we forgot that for a time.

    • @gosling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      879 months ago

      holy shit, imagine spending $44 billion just to use a domain you’ve been squatting since the Netscape era

  • João Pedro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    689 months ago

    I don’t give a shit. I wish social media platforms would stop giving attention to these uber rich. Make them pay their fucking taxes and relegate them to their lives. I don’t give a toss.

  • QubaXR
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That’s some 90s-dot-com-ass thinking from Elon. Nobody wants supercentralized services anymore. We’ve seen how giving one company too much data and too much power over our lives backfires every single time.

    Elon rolled high luck and as emerald mine heir was able to take risks some of which paid off. But he was never a super (stable) genius he (and others like him) would claim to be.

    • @such_fifty_bucks@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      We Lemmy users have seen. I mean everyone has seen I guess, but, it really seems like most people just don’t care. They’d rather have convenience and comfort of big brother squeezing their balls in a vice rather than put a little thought or effort into controlling their own lives and choices.

  • 52fighters
    link
    fedilink
    159 months ago

    With his day on SpaceX, does anyone consider him a national security risk?

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    Ah, this must be Elon before the hair plugs were installed.

  • @Zummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    From reading this article is sounds like Musk was never good at any of the shit that made him money. He surrounded himself with people that were so he seemed good because the group as a whole did good. And by the time people realized all this he had too much power to be removed.

  • Arotrios
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Oh, I think Musk has been hard at work making up a whole new slew of mistakes that will dwarf his previous ones in comparison. Let’s sit back and watch the genius work his magic…

    /popcorn

    EDIT: Well, that was quick…

  • fearout
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    Very interesting read. This article probably has the most sense out of everything I read about him in the news since he bought twitter. Not sure how close it is to the actual motivation behind all that’s happened, but if it is, it explains a lot.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 months ago

    Then there was the technical question: PayPal used Linux, while X.com was on Microsoft.

    I found the problem. 😉

  • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 months ago

    Sounds like he’s trying to set up his own bank? Who tf would trust him as a bank leader. If he’s trying to give himself loans, launder, etc., then I can see it.