• Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 days ago

    These things are less safe, yet I see people driving aggressively and recklessly more than ever.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Not if they crash into stationary objects like rocks, etc. In that case the amount of force the driver will experience will be 2-3 times higher compared to the amount of force a driver of a normal sedan will experience if he had the same accident.

        But yeah, those trucks are getting ridiculously big and heavy. They are not only bad for the environment, they are bad for the roads and other drivers and pedestrians. I am living in Europe and it is really infuriating that those cars are like 1.5 times a normal car and then you can’t even find a parking spot.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Not if they crash into stationary objects like rocks, etc. In that case the amount of force the driver will experience will be 2-3 times higher compared to the amount of force a driver of a normal sedan will experience if he had the same accident.

          this is not true, the deceleration (g force) imparted to passengers should be the same in either case. (all other things being equal, initial speed, crumple zones, etc). adding more mass to the car is irrelevant to the driver if you’re hitting a truly immovable object.

            • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              yes, the force applied to THE ROCK will be much higher, but the car’s mass is not relevant to the driver’s reference inside the car.