• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    How can we know there were no strong candidates, when they don’t get a real chance to run? They (and to be fair, most) simply assumed the incumbent was the best, because that’s the way its been forever.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Polling, usually. Otherwise primary results. Most states did have their primary, btw, only a handful cancelled. Each state has their own way of doing it.

      Can you name a candidate that was doing well at any point? Better than low single-digits? Dean was the only one I heard much about.

      edit: You do remember the write-in uncommitted thing, right? Those were primaries.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The early primary states were specifically changed to states where Bidens poll numbers were strongest. And yes, the early primary winners carry that momentum into states where they might be less popular. They didn’t have to change the primary order, but chose to, to help Biden.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Okay then, next was SC and Nevada. How far do we have to go before we see these changes? And who was the contender that was hurt by the changes?

              • Steve@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Here’s all the changes.

                Literally anyone could’ve been a contender. We don’t know who they are, because the party never wanted to seriously entertain anyone other than Biden.

                Contrast that with what the Republicans did. They had several debates with anyone who felt like giving it a shot. Trump decided he didn’t need participate, and was right. The Democrats could have done similar but refused to.

                Biden is too elderly. Trump is too many kinds of wrong. Most people know this. If the Democratic party figures out that Biden is almost the only candates weaker than trump, they’ll be able to win.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  So, that’s pretty much the same order as always, not seeing how that helps anyone.

                  And you can look up who runs if you want. You do not need to see debates to figure it out, someone announces after they file their paperwork, then its up to them to convince people to support them. You’re pretending like the DNC needs to do all this work to serve us up a platter of great options, but ignoring that it’s the candidates that determine how they get received. Don’t forget, most Americans still hate the idea of communism, too, even if they don’t actually know what it is.

                  This conspiracy theory nonsense is getting tiresome. The real world isn’t that simple.

                  • Steve@communick.news
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    That’s a very capitalistic form of democracy. Candates need to pull themselves up by their boot straps.

                    While the Republicans promote socialistic politics, giving candates universal basic airtime.

                    I get it now.