• CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      My personal theory is that jar jar is not a sith but rather a domestic terrorist that is really good at making it look like an accident

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I know this a joke theory (mostly), but given how much Star Wars rips from classic scifi works, I think looking at the Foundation books makes a good case for this being viable as more than a joke.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s not even viable. In canon, Jar Jar was relegated to being a shunned street performer on Theed where adults hated him but the children would laugh at his clown antics. A Sith lord wouldn’t become that, ever.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I am viewing from intention as written, when written for the films. It seems plausible that “Darth Jar Jar” or something similar could have been an original, but abandoned intention.

          • Dem Bosain
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Jar Jar is the key to all of this.” – George Lucas, during filming of The Phantom Menace