• EndOfLine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      The considered ban on masks was for protesters.

      The idea of not allowing anonymity for protesters has its origins in combating racial violence and the KKK. Klan members suddenly lost a lot of their motivation to assemble in public, once they had to show their faces, those that did were less likely to commit illegal acts and the ones that did break the law were more likely to face legal reprocutions.

      The contemplated ban on masks for protesters in Los Angeles was considered following increased violence by masked protesters and was not motivated by covid denial.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        5 months ago

        We weren’t living in a world with cameras everywhere when the KKK needed to be attacked so vigorously. Times have changed and things should be updated. Especially in a world where bigots are fine marching without masks (see Charlottesville).

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sure, a environment guaranteed to enable the rapid spread of any transmissible disease. I bet this ban wouldn’t apply to MAGA since they are not protesters. Just concerned citizens with hateful banners and firearms.

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      Cymraeg
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      For real. I wish it were these people killing themselves with their stupidity, not others…

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        A mask ban for protesters would also limit our ability to stop a pandemic spreading. Mask bans are a bad idea (especially with creepy af facial recognition around).