• jorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    do you really think the population would be allowed to reduce? GDP growth would never be allowed to slow down (or heaven forbid GDP shrink) and right now countries with low birth rates use immigration to fill that gap.

    look at Canada: small birth rate, but aiming for 100 million population by 2100.

    capitalism demands unsustainable growth

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Multiple wealthy countries have put incentives in place to encourage increased birth rates, all have failed. Other than forcibly inseminating women there’s not much they could do.

    • USSMojave@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It doesn’t matter what is “allowed,” people in highly developed countries, especially ones with low immigration, are experiencing freefalling birth rates that are already well below the replacement rate, and governments are BEGGING women to have more babies. See South Korea, China, and Japan

      • jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        you’re talking about incentives. I’m talking about restrictions women’s rights and education.

        do you think that’s out of the question? abortion bans are one part of this

      • jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        abortion bans, contraception bans, sex education bans, sabotaging the education system