Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1692arrow-down110cross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1682arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square100fedilinkcross-posted to: vivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlvivaldi_browser@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@chat.maiion.comtechnology@chat.maiion.comtechnology@feddit.chtechnology@lemmy.mlsysadmin@reddthat.comprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThat’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?
That’s fair but presumably, since they’re not racking up fines cumulatively, that they are now in accordance with the law… so are you saying that the current level is “reasonable”? Am I misunderstanding you point?