• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Crazy how the choice is between “everything the same with mild change (maybe)” and “everything horrible with the world”.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      The choice is between having an opportunity to make a difference and being actively prevented from doing so.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          A Trump administration will jail opponents, accelerate oil and gas drilling, and help to destroy the world that much faster.

          We don’t have any chance to improve things if they win one more time.

          Want a better world? It might be possible to still build one. You can’t look at Joe Biden and say “Eh, not good enough.”

          If his plans aren’t enough for your tastes, organize and do better. Inspire others around you.

          It’s not gonna be easy, and it might not even be possible. But each person who just gives up makes it that much harder for everyone else.

          Me, I’m 50. I don’t have a ton of hope. But I’d like to still have a chance to leave a world to another generation that isn’t completely overrun by fascism.

          Brazil pushed back. So did France and the UK. We CANNOT just give up.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ah alright, for some reason when I read the comment I wasn’t sure who you meant represented which. I’m not American but I’m definitely with you.

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            5 months ago

            We aren’t giving up. It was the DNC that gave up. Start putting the blame squarely where it belongs.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Blaming those with the least power for not bending the knee to the “leader” the powerfull have imposed on them instead of blaming those with the most power for not putting forward somebody worthy of the loyalty of the rest is a pretty interesting take for somebody posting in a supposedly Progressive forum.

                • Pronell@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s been four years and nobody stepped up.

                  Nobody said they wanted to be the successor. They didn’t build a campaign and start doing press tours.

                  We have No Labels and Brain Worms. That’s it. The progressives did not try to field a candidate, and now you’re saying there’s a boot on your neck.

                  Either fight or keep complaining. Bitching online is not progressive.

                  I’m trying to wake some of you up to the reality that we need to be united and getting a shitload of ‘Meh, whatever.’

                  Extremely hard to believe thats your progressive take.

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Edit: There’s some legalese that the DNC is shook about, so fair enough to be worried about Republicans and election shenanigans.

            If his plans aren’t enough for your tastes, organize and do better. Inspire others around you.

            This would be a valid point, if the DNC wasn’t trying to force a primary confirmation vote early, in order to ‘lock in’ Biden. Despite Biden welcoming challengers to make a play to delegates at the convention.

            I.e. “actively prevented from doing so”

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Might be irrelevant given the latest on Biden dropping maybe, but this is still the official line:_

                “no voting will begin before August 1.” They add that the vote is set to happen before the in-person Democratic National Convention that starts Aug. 19

                They’ve now explained the nuance and reasoning, which does change things a fair bit

                In June, Ohio passed a bill to move its deadline from Aug. 7 to Sept. 1. But because that law technically does not take effect until Sept. 1, the DNC said they are keeping their timeline of a pre-convention virtual roll call in place due to concern of litigation. Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose suggested earlier this month that Sept. 1 deadline to certify a candidate would stand.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s an election in November, so, no.

          If Trump gets what Project 2025 wants him to have, SCOTUS will repeal term limits, and he’ll challenge the results of the next election using his party-loyal Article F State Department.

          He’ll be “President” the same way Putin is “President.”

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            “but at least we didn’t have to hear biden stutter anymore, so it’s worth it” - crowd that wants their grandchildren growing up under project 2025.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            42
            ·
            5 months ago

            What do you mean “there’s an election in November?”

            The results of that contest have been written on the wall at least as far back as 2015 when the DNC put us on this course.

            The incumbent won’t step down, so the choice is between Trump or the guy that is expected to lose, which isn’t a choice at all.

            • sparkle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              Cymraeg
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Trump was “expected to lose” the 2016 election. Far more than Biden currently is

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                The 2016 election fell within the margin of error of the polls. Don’t act like Hillary was a shoe-in, nobody who was paying attention was surprised after the shit she and the DNC got up to in the primary.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          You do not get to insist that everything be the way you want it to be.

          Grow up and use the power you actually have rather than spamming your discontent everywhere.

          Work for what you want to happen. Or just roll over and invite the fascists in. Those are your two choices, and you’re saying the first one isn’t a choice.

          That says A WHOLE LOT about you.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            5 months ago

            You do not get to insist that everything be the way you want it to be.

            It’s a free country. I can insist on whatever I want, just like you are free to ignore me.

            Grow up and use the power you actually have rather than spamming your discontent everywhere.

            I’m almost 40 and I’ve been banging on this drum since Bush v. Gore. If you don’t like having a political conversation with someone who demands better from the Democrats and our government then you’re going to want to stop engaging with politics entirely.

            Work for what you want to happen.

            I’m trying, but people like you keep telling me to resign myself to Biden’s inevitable loss because we can’t do any better.

            Or just roll over and invite the fascists in. Those are your two choices, and you’re saying the first one isn’t a choice.

            Of course there isn’t a choice, we either vote for Biden or we get Trump. That’s not a choice, that’s a hostage situation.

            That says A WHOLE LOT about you.

            Precisely.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      At least with everything the same we maintain the chance to turn it into “make everything better”, as easy as it is to get disillusioned with the system at present, nobody can deny that it’s a lot easier to achieve anything within than a defacto fascist autocracy

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The amount of change we’ll see will be directly related to congressional control. SCOTUS Justices aren’t going to impeach themselves. AOC can write anything she wants, but it won’t pass a vote with congressional minority.