• cranakis@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d like in on that perspective but I’m not going to twitter for anyone. Shit is toxic and stupid.

    On Ukraine, got any non twitter suggestions for perspective? Also, not familiar with OSINT. Care to enlighten me? Open source intel tools?

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Understandable, I don’t know of anyone off of Twitter but maybe some of the people I follow are on Mastodon. I’ll try and find out sometime and get back if they are.

      And yea pretty much, just stands for open source intelligence, people just use publicly available data (mostly drone videos, and paid satellite imagery) to analyze progress from both parties in the conflict giving a real, semi live perspective on advances on the ground, what kind of equipment and quantity of that equipment that have been destroyed.

      This site by oryx is the main one I know of that tracks destroyed Russian equipment that’s confirmed through imagery, so the numbers are likely fairly lower than reality, and the destruction numbers are still staggering.

      Ops I see someone below already linked oryx and some other good sources!

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      On Ukraine, got any non twitter suggestions for perspective?

      not familiar with OSINT

      Exactly what you said! Open Source INTelegence. Basically people taking publicly available data and using it to confirm attacks. Things like NASA FIRMS data can be used to verify where fires are; and when combined with videos of a fire in the direction of an airfield, for example, can be used to confirm that yes, on this specific date, these parts of an airfield are on fire.