Someone sent this to me. I thought it was pretty cool.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    +1 for the anarcho-syndicalism flag, but these movies would only be tolerable to me if they found some sort of renewable alternative to oil

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t watch post-apocalyptic movies for solutions to things. The whole point of those movies is there were no solutions.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not as a solution, but just because it doesn’t make any sense. Oil is a scarce resource, yet they burn it as if it isn’t. Actually they’d all be on bicycles if they didn’t find an alternative energy for their train-car-machines

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          My thought is that it becomes a lot less scarce if 99% of the population is dead and the remaining oil only has to cover the needs of 1%. Even less than that, in fact, because you had to be an elite raider type to even have a working vehicle. Most of the remaining population just live in the dirt and get out of the way when cars go by.