• outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Almost, impeachment is one big one allowed. I believe only one justice was impeached but I bet the issue is, you can’t get republicans to agree as then democrats can put one in. Which is a terrible injustice so they’ll make sure to vote down anything to make sure the supreme court stays right winged.

    • Nepoleon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because Supreme Court cant create their own laws directly, missing legislature power, having no direct power to control national finances/budgets, a main power of a country and they dont have control of the executives including army and police. All their power depends on laws made by legislature and constitution.

      Thats how the three pillars of power works in all democracies. Just because your legislature or executives or even forefathers who made the constitution fucked up, doesnt mean the supreme court is an absolute monarchy. The biggest piece of shit mistake you made was having a two party system. In other countries, supreme courts arent as binary partisan. Coalitions of Partys vote way more reasonable judges to supreme courts

      • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering the Supreme Court’s entire schtick is the arbitrary definition of a word’s meaning by the sitting justices… I’d disagree.

        They can literally change the definition of a law at a whim. It doesn’t really matter at that point what the law even says unless it’s lawyered up specifically to remove their powers. Even then, don’t expect the conservative justices to go down without a fight lol.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that they blatantly collude with the other two pillars. They can’t make their own laws, but they can collude with the others to bring a case to their doorstep to make a ruling not based on precedent or good faith interpretation of the law.

        They effectively can create whatever laws they want, just with extra steps.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        George Washington warned against bicameralism, but they ignored him. Our Supreme Court positions have always been non-partisan until recent history.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats how the three pillars of power works in all democracies.

        And the amount of people willing to dismantle this particular one means it does serve its purpose well.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “unelected” part is on purpose, though I’d prefer sortition.

      The biggest group of voters may decide who controls the government, but they shouldn’t decide who takes places in the supreme court. At least not in the same mechanism.

      Well, unless you can make it a 95% “in favor” vote, of course. Then, I guess, there’d be no hope anyway.