• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    The problem isn’t analogue Vs digital, or even software controlled or not. It’s about the design assuming:

    1. The manufacturer will always exist
    2. The manufacturer should be the only one to maintain the device.
    3. The manufacture will define what the owner will do with the device.

    An analogue device can be at fault too. Proprietary parts. Construction techniques which don’t allow for dissambly without destroying things. All that stuff.

    …but you’re right. Buy the items that let you service them, that don’t rely on cloud servers and software updates, that use standard parts, etc, etc. Right to repair legislation is good too, but the companies understand purchasing power more. So educate those around you too.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of what’s driving these decisions is the mass switch to subscription models. Everything’s designed so you have to keep coming back to the manufacturer.

      It used to be making a high quality, standalone product meant you could spend less on customer service and RMA’s. Now they’ve figured out they can sell you service contracts and make money off you being locked in.

    • AnarchoSnowPlow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Analogue doesn’t have firmware that can reject a device based on id.

      So you can reverse engineer a replacement part if you absolutely have to.