I understand that weather on TV can’t be hyperlocally accurate. But a weather app on my phone has my exact GPS coordinates. Why can’t it tell me exactly when a rain cloud will be passing over my location?

It’s gotten to the point where I just use precipitation maps to figure out my rain chances for the day.

The hourly forecast is mostly useless because it’s not a chance % but a % of the area that will be raining.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    It amazes me how some people seem to go through life not realizing weather is fundamentally chaotic.

    Like, even if all you do is look out a window from time to time…

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Butterfly effect. Even Hari Sheldon in the Foundation series couldn’t do that.

      • DokPsy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Psychohistory was designed for large groups. It wasn’t designed for single creatures like butterflies

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It wasn’t because it couldn’t. Hari tried it and failed. Applying Psychohistory to only large enough populations was his compromise. This is mentioned in Prelude to Foundation. I think Hari specifically mentions how complex predicting weather is iirc. That’s why I mentioned it in the first place.

          • DokPsy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            At the time Hari tried to apply it at the small scale, it was impossible. I believe by the time Gaia takes over the science could be applied to the single organism but that also feels like cheating.

            The whole point of prelude and forward was that his attempts to start on the smaller scale by going backwards in time was a fools errand and impossible but starting with the relatively small scale of just Trantor was doable as it had sufficient mass to apply the generalized mathematics towards. The variables on the smaller scales were too numerous but as you abstract towards larger bodies, it reduces the complexity to the point it becomes calculable.

            Well, not the whole point but still

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No shade but I could not take the premise of that book seriously. The idea that any complex system could be mapped thousands of years into the future is so incredibly unrealistic to me that I was unable to suspend my disbelief.

          I’m a massive Dune fan though so I have no leg to stand on. Hold on a second while I re-calibrate my metabolism and use my genetic heritage to recall events that happened 30000 years ago.

          • DokPsy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            So, what Hari does is basically game theory on a massive scale. The larger the group, the less complexity because you’re abstracting the different possible issues individuals would have out of the problem. Instead of making it more complex, it simplifies the whole thing because all the chaotic bits cancel each other out.

            And slight spoiler warning for an old story but you find out later that the whole thing isn’t just predicted ahead of time and let loose but a group of people follow along in the shadows to keep the plan on track.

    • Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not that surprising to me. Chaos theory is not well known/understood and we are accustomed to seeing weather reports from childhood, it’s not odd to expect them to be accurate.