• Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yeah, we saw this coming. When Manifest v3 first talked about.

    Google an ad company are killing ad blockers. Yeah, that sounds right.

      • DivineDev@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wish, but I don’t see it happening. Most people are just content with seeing ads absolutely everywhere, I just don’t get it.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          I wouldn’t mind the basic shit like a banner here or a side bar there. But the fucking obnoxious mid page ads, auto playing videos, scam link shit can go die in a hole.

          • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            I used to not mind them, now I do. They over did it and I can’t go back. I will block ads untill I can’t and then I’ll probably climb a clock tower with an Uzi.

            I won’t really climb a clock tower with an Uzi.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            I wouldn’t mind the basic shit like a banner here or a side bar there.

            Since those are semi-regularly vectors for malware now, even those are not safe to allow.

          • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It’s things like this that keep me using an ad blocker. I was researching when sunflowers develop their seeds, for crying out loud. Screenshot of a plug-in which has blocked ”127 ads" on this page Edit: this was on Opera. It’s… fine.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        The issue is MV2 made it way too easy for malicious browser extensions to do bad things, like read the content of every page you visit. MV3 makes it much harder for malicious browser extensions to do these things, but makes it harder to do things like intercept network requests.

        Then allow a savvy user to choose to keep MV2 mode via an opt-in control instead of depreciating years of hard work by non-malicious extension authors. uBlock Origin is, in fact, the ONLY browser extension I use in Chrome, as Firefox is my main browser.

      • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        From my understanding, MV3 kills vital features of ad-blockers in that

        1. Some filtering rules do rely on the ability to read the content of the webpage, which can’t be migrated, per the FAQ linked in the article
        2. The declarative API means an update to the rules requires an update to the plugin itself, which might get delayed by the reviewing process, causing the blocker to lag behind the tracker. It might not be able to recover as quickly as uBO in the recent YouTube catch-up round.
      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        And yet the likelihood of Google publishing a malicious extension is quite low. Not sure why you’re so adamant about defending their shitty anti-adblock actions, making excuses for a mega corporation.

      • sapporo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        . Some of them could also be implemented with native messaging.

        Some? Or all?

        uBlockOrigin would still loose some of its features and capabilities nonetheless, even if a sub-set of them could be implemented in other ways. Not?