• ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Well, this was actually fkning concerning. Ofk is not like other Company aren’t playing to launch thousand of satellites too. There should be a serious regulation and some heavy changes in the metal alloy used at very least. I’m sure that Trump already has a plan about it…

    … ofk i’m fking kidding. Vote [everyone else] x president .

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      So we’re starting to look at aluminum debris in the upper atmosphere, when are we going to look at carbon fibre debris? Or rocket fuel in the upper atmosphere? We dont know what any of that shit does. Im going to hazard a guess that it does nothing good.

      If you were to light ten thousand Starlink satellites on fire in a bonfire on the ground people would put you in jail. When it happens in the upper atmosphere its called progress.

      • ekZepp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Completely stopping the launch of new satellites will simply not happen. The only realistic response is to face the problem and improve the technology.

        • Infynis
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s the problem with capitalism. They won’t improve the technology until we force them

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just like they’re doing with the climate catastrophe.

          Reasoned, sensible change, carried out quickly and paid for by the companies responsible.

          • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Well, it did work for the ozone hole.

            It should work for the current climate catastrophe and the aluminium thing too, if about 50% of the electorate, 90% of its representatives, and 99% of the people in charge of big companies weren’t mentally handicapped imbeciles, too (if we count being a psychopath as a mental handicap).

    • yogurt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Type of metal doesn’t matter, it’s any particle that leftover CFCs from the 1970s can stick to and make it more likely for them to react and destroy ozone. The ozone hole is over Antarctica and changes size seasonally because high altitude ice clouds do the same thing, smoke from forest fires also does it.