liquidcat@lemmy.ml to Unixporn@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago[OC] sxw - Simple X Widgetslemmy.mlimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1219arrow-down1image[OC] sxw - Simple X Widgetslemmy.mlliquidcat@lemmy.ml to Unixporn@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredegenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoI like it, but now I’m a little sad that I just switched to Wayland
minus-squaredegenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoI thought you were dissing Wayland at first but I searched for good measure. It looks pretty sleek too!
minus-squaredegenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNot since it depends on X. I don’t use xwayland but I’m guessing that could work, just with more overhead.
minus-squaredegenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI haven’t really looked at the details, but there might actually not be much overhead from the protocol itself. It does amount to running an X server beside Wayland though, I believe.
![[OC] sxw - Simple X Widgets](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/29f68b31-4337-41e4-b358-0336b54aed15.png){kind=link}
I like it, but now I’m a little sad that I just switched to Wayland
You can try eww
I thought you were dissing Wayland at first but I searched for good measure. It looks pretty sleek too!
huh, does this not work on wayland
Not since it depends on X. I don’t use xwayland but I’m guessing that could work, just with more overhead.
why more overhead?
I haven’t really looked at the details, but there might actually not be much overhead from the protocol itself. It does amount to running an X server beside Wayland though, I believe.