Meldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 1 month agoUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1725arrow-down124
arrow-up1701arrow-down1imageUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfMeldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 1 month agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squaredrunkpostdisaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down5·1 month agoTo be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvernlinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down2·1 month agoFor the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoNo. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
minus-squareMacStache@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoGood news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!
To be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
For the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
No. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
Good news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!