vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoSubvert wants to be ‘a collectively owned Bandcamp successor’musically.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1194arrow-down13
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkSubvert wants to be ‘a collectively owned Bandcamp successor’musically.comvovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·3 months agoThey explained what they’re trying to do, but they didn’t explain the how, and that annoyed me. Why do we have to wait for the countdown to know actual relevant information about this project?
minus-squarelemmeBe@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 months agoExactly! I’m all for it, but why the secrecy instead of transparency from the start? Maybe those 80% of people have some initial advantage.
They explained what they’re trying to do, but they didn’t explain the how, and that annoyed me. Why do we have to wait for the countdown to know actual relevant information about this project?
Exactly! I’m all for it, but why the secrecy instead of transparency from the start? Maybe those 80% of people have some initial advantage.