midwest.social
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
vriska1@lemm.ee to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 years ago

Google’s Web Environment Integrity project raises a lot of concerns

siliconangle.com

external-link
message-square
23
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.world
1
external-link

Google’s Web Environment Integrity project raises a lot of concerns

siliconangle.com

vriska1@lemm.ee to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
23
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.world
Google’s Web Environment Integrity project raises a lot of concerns - SiliconANGLE
siliconangle.com
external-link
Google’s Web Environment Integrity project raises a lot of concerns - SiliconANGLE
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • kilgore@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is there any way to block or spoof the collection oftheis data?

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not if they force you to get your shit signed by Google to connect to a site.

      • Azzy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not even with containers (in a similar way to how Firefox already handles DRM?)

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          If Google gets their way, either Google* authenticates you or you’re SOL.

          *they’re selling it as others can too, but it will be super limited. If Firefox supported it it would only be for their build and sites would likely only validate them if you were restricted on extensions.

          • Azzy@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            …fuck. I’ve been having this idea where sites could perhaps be loaded in the background with the drm in a container, with the content being displayed for the user, with this front end content being modifiable by extensions and such. So if a button needed JavaScript, the JavaScript would be ran in the DRM container and the content would be added to the user’s view.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I want an internet without Google.

  • vriska1@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you oppose this, don’t just comment and complain, contact your antitrust authority today:

    US:

    https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/report-antitrust-violation

    antitrust@ftc.gov

    EU:

    https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/contact_en

    comp-greffe-antitrust@ec.europa.eu

    UK:

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tell-the-cma-about-a-competition-or-market-problem

    general.enquiries@cma.gov.uk

    France:

    https://signal.conso.gouv.fr/fr/tel-internet-media/faire-un-signalement

    Germany: @kartellamt@social.bund.de (anti-cartel bureau) of @BMWK https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Kartellverbot/Anonyme_Hinweise/anonymehinweise_node.html https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Missbrauchsaufsicht/missbrauchsaufsicht_node.html

    Philippines:

    https://www.phcc.gov.ph/file-a-complaint/

    enforcement@phcc.gov.ph

    India:

    https://www.cci.gov.in/antitrust/

    https://www.cci.gov.in/filing/atd

    Canada:

    https://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/frm-eng/GHÉT-7TDNA5

    • IverCoder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Philippines:

      https://www.phcc.gov.ph/file-a-complaint/

      enforcement@phcc.gov.ph

      • vriska1@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Added

    • TwoGems@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks!

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I got a 400 bad request for the CA link

      • vriska1@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Works fine for me?

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Very odd...

    • Kevin Karhan :verified:@mstdn.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      @vriska1 for Germany: @kartellamt@social.bund.de (anti-cartel bureau) of @BMWK
      https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Kartellverbot/Anonyme_Hinweise/anonymehinweise_node.html
      https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/DE/Missbrauchsaufsicht/missbrauchsaufsicht_node.html

      • vriska1@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thanks I will add that to my future comments!

  • FoxBJK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Before this thread turns into another circlejerk about how great Firefox is, I just wanna throw something out there; the whole point of the open web is that people use whatever browser they wish. I completely understand the push for Firefox right now, but everyone switching to one browser isn’t the answer. In fact that’s literally how we got to where we are.

    Use whatever software you want! These are your devices and I’m not gonna shame you for how you choose to use them. What’s important is that an open web is maintained so you have that choice.

    • xeetzer@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Google Chrome is so far ahead that I don’t think we have to worry about people pushing for Firefox…

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Use whatever software you want! These are your devices and I’m not gonna shame you for how you choose to use them. What’s important is that an open web is maintained so you have that choice.

      Except the issue is, if people use Chromium-based browsers, then Google still has all the power and has the monopoly. If people use whatever browser they want, and it happens to be a Chromium-based browser or even Chromium itself, then we end up back in the same position as we’re in now and nothing changes.

      That’s why everyone is recommending Firefox.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Shaming isn’t the answer for sure, but educating about why entertaining this monopoly further hurts people certainly is. And with gecko/Firefox being the last competing alternative to blink/WebKit, in practical terms, that’s where we are at. Unless there is a drastic change, there’s no hope for an open web to keep existing. And the arrival of a new player is practically impossible due to the complexity of modern web (even Microsoft gave up, Opera couldn’t keep going, etc.)

    • sotolf@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      How likely do you think it is that even with the heavy push anything more than a small percentage of people will switch.

      • persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Apple and other companies with web browsers are probably our biggest hope. People will complain if websites just ‘stop working’ one day because of their browser choice.

        That said, I’m probably fooling myself. PECO.com, a huge electric company, doesn’t work unless I’m in incognito mode. I think it fails if you are signed into another corporation’s Microsoft 365 account. But they don’t seem to care.

  • Engywook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Oh, look. It’s only been posted a thousand times this week…

  • yum13241@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s DRM for the internet. The open web is fucking dead.

    In loving memory, RIP TCP/IP based internet
    
    1973 - 2023
    
    Rest In Peace. We missed you.
    

Technology@beehaw.org

technology@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 523 users / day
  • 1.37K users / week
  • 3.04K users / month
  • 7.54K users / 6 months
  • 360 local subscribers
  • 38.7K subscribers
  • 4.96K Posts
  • 87.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • coldredlight@beehaw.org
  • Leigh@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org