• stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thing about batteries is.

      From an environmental standpoint, both mining the raw materials and producing the batteries uses a lot of energy and produces a lot of pollution.

      Morally, many raw materials for batteries come from desperately poor conflict zones, so you have megacorps staffing mines with slavery and child labor, paying local warlords/dictators for permission to operate, having those warlords/dictators kill protesters and union organizers, etc.

      If we can get a hydrogen economy working, and the equipment and technology don’t need conflict minerals or polluting heavy industry to manufacture, it would be a boon for the world both practically and morally.

      But that’s a big if.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hydrogen fuel cells need rare earth metals, too. Sodium and iron air batteries, in contrast, don’t need a whole lot. For that matter, lithium batteries are opening up more abundant sources. People misunderstood what “reserves” means for minerals.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hydrogen can be stored in underground caverns and that can be relatively easily scaled to TWh. Electrolysis and fuel cell can get you 70% or so of your electricity back. So it is less efficient then batteries. However there might be a place for hydrogen as seasonal storage. Also the storage makes sense as quite a few processes use hydrogen anyway.

      So there is a use case, but right now we mostly should just add renewables and batteries. We are nowhere close to a solar/wind grid, which does actually need seasonal storage. Also grid size helps a lot and there are options such as burning waste.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Electrolysis of the most expensive process (PEM) is around 80% efficient by itself. The more common methods are 70%. Anything that uses it after that only drops it further. Fuel cells max out at 60%, which means that electrolysis to electrical output efficiently is about 50% altogether in the very best case.

        Some of the better internal combustion engines are reaching about the same.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      After my batteries are charged. I have 40kW, but excess would probably go toward the diesel powered implements I have, that way they can run more efficiently and reduce emissions.