• HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “There’s nobody anti-islamic who’s not a fascis”

    I’m sorry but you can be violently anti-religion without being a fascist. Considering religions for what they are - a way to dominate the people by fear anddesinformation - does not mean that you are going to prevent people from practicing their religion. You are just making damn sure they don’t advocate them in public schools, hospitals and administrations.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m sorry but you can be violently anti-religion without being a fascist.

      Yes, that was exactly my point. I’m complaining that in the current political scene there are no parties that separate those ideas.
      And yes, banning the public display will only make it go underground and become stronger, this is why it’s so important to separate anti-religion from fascism.

    • supertrucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, no you can’t. What you are doing is substituting your political beliefs for your religious ones, and that at its core is what separates a facist from any other political belief system

        • supertrucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s the problem with both religion and politics. If you think you’re right and everyone else is wrong, you can’t help but to I fringe on other people’s right to practice. That’s why anyone that thinks a leftist government can be a democracy with opposition political parties is at best wrong