• Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Democratically instituted communisim? For all the uppity yall get when someone suggests democratic socialist policies, you sure can’t seem to find the line you blurred.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My country was on the path of the democratically instituted socialism thing. Well, it tried but the United States instigated, funded and armed a military coup and the military dictatorship that followed.

      Guess it’s better to have torture camps than gobbunism

      • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Democratic Socialism is alive and well in many countries without any U.S. intervention. You must be referring to the fascist kind.

        • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ah, yes, the United States famously only interferes in fascist countries and not for benefit of plutocrats.

          Also, which demsoc countries are you talking about where the means of production are controlled by the working class?

          • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            What kind of argument is that? You’ve literally reiterated the spirit of this meme and directed it towards the U.S. The question was name a country that has instituted communisim successfully. As for part 2, you live in a fantasy that worker controlled production can exist without any administration or bureaucracy, ie. centralization. This right here is what true socialism has failed at repeatedly. Name one successful example.

              • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Oh, here come the uppity remarks, I am a dual citizen of a country with a socialist party, thanks for the down-the-nose leer in my direction without providing any education.

                  • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Look man, does it ever? Did you know that it’s impossible to do so until we find a way to automate administrative duties?

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Is that socialist party in power? Is it actually socialist, or does it just call itself that? Because a lot of European “socialist” parties aren’t; most are liberal social welfare parties at best.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So every AES state is also Democratic Socialist too.

              Or do you mean Socialism established through liberal reform? That’s very rare, only really established in countries like Chile under Allende, before the US supported a coup to overthrow him.

              • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s underselling it. Before he was even president, the CIA kidnapped and killed the Commander in Chief of the Chilean army for refusing to send the army during his inauguration. There was political and economical warfare for fear of a “functioning socialist government” in South America. According to Nixon “the choice of government by the Chileans was unacceptable”.