I never received formal education in the subject and I want to learn about it so that I may have a better understanding of the philosophy of our political tradition. I’d appreciate any suggestions on materials to get an introduction to the topic.

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Which field? As a Marxist, my favorite work is Politzer’s Elementary Principles of Philosophy. It goes over Idealism, Materialism, Dialectical Idealism, and then ties it together into Dialectical Materialism, and then Historical Materialism.

    lenin-tea

    Philosophy has a long history, and it builds and rejects and references previous philosophers all the time, so if you want to study all of philosophy, there is no real waste in starting from the “classical” philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates, and moving up from there to your Hegel, Decartes, Nietzche, etc, though I personally stick with Marxists.

    • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Was it you that recommended Elementary Principles to me a few months back? I finally got around to starting it and I’m a bit over halfway through and it’s probably going to be my gold standard for understanding not only the pipeline between classical philosophy to Marxism, but it’s also a way better resource imo for understanding Material and Historical Dialectics. It’s so good and it’s very easy to read.

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think so? I’ve recommended it before. Glad you like it! Read it over the course of a week and it expanded my knowledge of Marxist philosophy dramatically. It’s extremely clear and tries to meet everyone, no academic language that might go over untrained heads, without getting dull.

        • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s absolutely filling in a few holes in my own reading. My former understanding was that Marx and Engels agreed with the conclusion of Hegel’s work but not the meat and potatoes of it. This does a good job at answering a lot of the whys so far. Like I basically only knew Hegel, like most religious philosophers as an idealist, and Marx and Engels as Materialists, but outside of organized religion, I wasn’t familiar with how those schools of thought evolved over time. Or the fact that Idealism still perpetuates itself in everything around us even today.

          • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            For me, 2 of the biggest aspects were the evolution of philosophy over time alongside Mode of Production, scientific developent, and technological development, as well as dialectics as comparing subjects within their contexts and trajectories. Massive change in understanding.

    • Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess I want to get to Marx and the anarchists by understanding the history before them, what people’s arguments were, and the context for why people asked certain questions and gave the answers they gave.

      Also I think it is useful to get a general understanding of even people we disagree strongly with, so it would be important to look into that too.