- cross-posted to:
- breadtube@lemmy.world
- mensliberation@lemmy.ca
- furry@pawb.social
- cross-posted to:
- breadtube@lemmy.world
- mensliberation@lemmy.ca
- furry@pawb.social
You must log in or register to comment.
No, and also no.
Also porn
Why do people feel the need to censor words when they are posting a topic that contains the words…if it offends the poster so much, DONT POST IT.
Did you watch the video before disagreeing with it? We’ve had the concept of clickbait titles for quite a while now, so it would be silly if someone still hasn’t realized how they work. It unsurprisingly does not say that furry porn is objectively “hotter”, but moreso that it’s objectively healthier, for both participants and emotional state. There are lessons to learn by comparison and study, instead of sticking our heads in the sand and pretending that there are no problems with the porn industry.
There is nothing healthy about pretending you’re a wolf and wanting to fuck someone dressed as a horse.
There is nothing healthy about retreating into some fantasy that you’re deep down actually a random animal.
There’s nothing healthy about attraction to animal body characteristics.
Stop sticking your head in the sand and pretending there are no problems with furries.
You have a very misguided view of what being a furry really is based on some of the loudest weirdos that also happen to be furries.
I’m sorry are you saying furry porn is consumed by the minority of furries?
And if so, I take it you also disagree with the premise of this video that furry porn is healthier than human porn?
I mean there aren’t any victims in furry porn since they’re drawings of completely fictional characters. Nobody is even running the risk of being exploited in furry porn.
Being addicted to porn is unhealthy no matter what type of porn it is; but that’s not what the video is about.
That’s like saying there’s no victims in AI kiddie porn.
The concept is the problem, not just the execution.
The concept of checks notes “having a fantasy” is a problem? Are you high? Shit’s only a problem if it becomes an addiction and starts affecting your life negatively. Which again, has zip to do with the type of content.
That’s not really how furries work so you might want to work a little harder if you’re going to designate yourself as the puritan police of what people are allowed to like. Let me know when you’ve moved on to how gay sex is unnatural and trans people aren’t real.
No.
We suffer real crimes, I could be murdered for who I love in large swathes of the world.
Furries are not LGBT adjacent, furries are closer to paedophilia/necrophilia/etc in that it’s an unhealthy attraction.
Unhealthy designated by you, the puritan police? Do you know that the anti-LGBT people also consider being gay unhealthy? They’re drawing the line in a different place, but still playing the same role you are. Would you recommend shock therapy for furries, or is that just a cure for being gay? If you’re so concerned with how the furry fandom works you should maybe actually research your bigotry and learn that it’s massive, and no two furries express themselves in the same way. Many do not have overlapping interests at all. You are on the fediverse, so I’d suggest you get comfortable with the idea that people are allowed to exist without your permission.
Furries by nature are either attracted to animal aesthetics or think they are one.
That is not healthy, accept it.
That is again not even close to a correct definition, and it is interesting that you think yourself the best person to judge something that you don’t know the first thing about.
