CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 16 days agobumboclotsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1276arrow-down1imagebumboclotsh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareInvertedParallax@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·16 days ago That’s not indefensible because NATO doesn’t intend to fight an artillery war We didn’t expect to fight a war against a country with an army straight out of WW2. We’re trying to help a country fight a war with 60 year old gear. Give them real tech and let them roll the idiots.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvernlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 days agoConsidering that’s what the only two militaries that could challenge NATO are…
minus-squareInvertedParallax@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-215 days agoDon’t leave me in suspense, who does number 2 work for?!?! No military could challenge nato. If China tried they would suddenly have the largest fleet of permanent submarines in history, like Russia has been.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvernlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-215 days agoThat’s great, but they still conquered all of mainland Asia!
We didn’t expect to fight a war against a country with an army straight out of WW2.
We’re trying to help a country fight a war with 60 year old gear. Give them real tech and let them roll the idiots.
Considering that’s what the only two militaries that could challenge NATO are…
Don’t leave me in suspense, who does number 2 work for?!?!
No military could challenge nato. If China tried they would suddenly have the largest fleet of permanent submarines in history, like Russia has been.
That’s great, but they still conquered all of mainland Asia!