Telegram is no longer safe for piracy.

I bet they will start kicking out piracy channels in few weeks.

I am going to delete my account now as it will become useless soon anyway.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Matrix is great and works great.

          Element is a semi abandoned client that happened to come from some of the makers of matrix.

          Use literally anything else. Fluffychat works for me. Element is okay for debugging sometimes so I keep it handy.

          But the commenters point stands. In matrix, you can send whatever you like, as illegal or morally corrupt as you wish because its nobody‘s fucking business AND e2ee.

          If someone on my server sends csam, I would never know unless someone reported it to me. Because thats how privacy works.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I tried a Piracy group in Matrix and there was less than 100 users…and the only active poster was a bot (or honeypot) advertising explicit CSAM related telegram groups for purchase… just looking at the words made a pit in my stomach

        That’s the double edged sword with no moderation abilities

        • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          there are moderation abilities, but instead of all-seeing global moderators it must be done by the little poor room owner, and the mods they have granted permission.

          if the existing owner/mods don’t do that, and disgusting content starts appearing in the room, that means they probably aren’t active anymore, and that it’s time to make a new room with the still active members before something even more damaging happens, like an uncontrollable high volume spammer, at which point you won’t be able to tell the others that you have made a new room.

      • adr1an@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But terrible handling of metadata. Which is the case for all chat apps AFAIK. Like, even with OMEMO, who talks with whom, and when, can be exposed. Which sometimes is enough to get legal issues (e.g. Ola Bini’s case)

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Speaking about XMPP, compared to centralized services, at least the “who talks to whom” and metadata concerns in general are partially mitigated by not having all the metadata converge towards a single host, being able to selfhost, and being able to host behind tor/i2p/…

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      XMPP; an open protocol that can be as basic as IRC or extended to support everything Telegram does and more. Decentralised (since it’s a protocol), and E2EE through OMEMO or by encrypting with PGP client side is something your provider can’t even have control over.

    • someonesmall@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Signal is probably the best option because it’s as easy to setup as Telegram and others.

      • nintendiator@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Signal is unfortunately as vulnerable to this as Telegram is, as it is a fully centralized service so once the CEO is grabbed is Game Over. Something like jabber / XMPP would be better.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Signal is E2EE encrypted (similar to Telegram’s secret chats but probably better) so it’s less vulnerable. If people know about it they can ask Signal to ban you, but they can’t just passively spy on everything.

          That said, XMPP is better still IMO.

          (Edit: centralization isn’t as big a problem as you might think with Signal. The wealthy own the whole world now. You can’t set up somewhere outside their jurisdiction, you can only stay ahead of them as they force people to stop hosting you. Sending a takedown to Signal is the same as sending it to your hosting provider, do not fool yourself. )

          • u_tamtam@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can host (tens? of) thousands of XMPP sessions on a RPi at the back of your router or in a field hooked to a PV panel and sim card, and none of “the wealthy” knowing or caring about it, though. The difference with signal is that everyone can do that, and everyone doing it expands the network and makes it more resilient for the benefits of all.