9/11 qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

Building implosion

In the controlled demolition industry, building implosion is the strategic placing of explosive material and timing of its detonation so that a structure collapses on itself in a matter of seconds, minimizing the physical damage to its immediate surroundings. Despite its terminology, building implosion also includes the controlled demolition of other structures, like bridges, smokestacks, towers, and tunnels. This is typically done to save time and money of what would otherwise be an extensive demolition process with construction equipment, as well as to reduce construction workers exposure to infrastructure that is in severe disrepair.

Building implosion, which reduces to seconds a process which could take months or years to achieve by other methods, typically occurs in urban areas[citation needed] and often involves large landmark structures.

The actual use of the term “implosion” to refer to the destruction of a building is a misnomer. This had been stated of the destruction of 1515 Tower in West Palm Beach, Florida. "What happens is, you use explosive materials in critical structural connections to allow gravity to bring it down.

The term “implosion” was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It’s a more descriptive way to explain what we do than “explosion”. There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn’t erupting outward. It’s actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we’re really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down.

  • Stacy Loizeaux, NOVA, December 1996

Building implosion techniques do not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to collapse a structure. Instead, the goal is to induce a progressive collapse by weakening or removing critical supports; therefore, the building can no longer withstand gravity loads and will fail under its own weight

Numerous small explosives, strategically placed within the structure, are used to catalyze the collapse. Nitroglycerin, dynamite, or other explosives are used to shatter reinforced concrete supports. Linear shaped charges are used to sever steel supports. These explosives are progressively detonated on supports throughout the structure. Then, explosives on the lower floors initiate the controlled collapse.

A simple structure like a chimney can be prepared for demolition in less than a day. Larger or more complex structures can take up to six months of preparation to remove internal walls and wrap columns with fabric and fencing before firing the explosives.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

    • Yor [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This debate wasn’t for us

      even so, her answers on palestine and “israel” were so bad. I was hoping that would do something to upset them

      maybe that was even too much to hope for, but unfortunately I hoped for just a bit of solidarity with palestine and this morning I’m just feeling depressed. I should have known, idk why I thought otherwise

    • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      and is hot for a politician.

      oh come on lmao. Not being 75 years old like every other major politician does not make a person hot. She’s a normal looking woman who almost entirely appears in suits behind a podium, why are people trying to be sexual about it lmao

      And even my mother who is by no means left wing, a pretty typical lib with a heart but no tendency towards socialism, thought she had a poor showing on climate change, immigration, and was annoyed by her refusal to answer the questions a few times. I didn’t ask how she felt about palestine, but kamala did not do great IMO, she left the libs wishing for obama back.

      Trump did even worse yeah, but this wasn’t a good showing even for the libs or the hogs it is aimed at