• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just following longstanding studio practice of putting the masters in a vault so you can forget about them.

    They’re not used to the risks of bit rot.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      A studio should be able to afford a good LTO tape drive for at least one backup copy; LTO tapes last over 30 years and suffer less from random bitrot than spinning disks. Just pay someone to spend a month duplicating the entire archive every couple of decades. And every decade you can also consolidate a bunch of tapes since the capacity has kept increasing; 18TB tapes are now available: $/MB it’s always far cheaper to use tape.

      They could have done that with the drives, but today you’d have to go find an ATA IDE or old SCSI card (of you’re lucky) that’ll work on a modern motherboard.

      But I’d guess their problem is more not having a process for maintaining the archives than the technology. Duplicating and consolidating hard drives once a year would have been relatively cheap, and as long as they verified checksums and kept duplicates, HDs would have been fine too.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Easy work for a digital archivist.

        Music studios didn’t have those in the 1990’s.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree; it probably didn’t occur to them. But it was a fairly common job in IT in the 90’s. Not a career or job description, maybe, but a duty you got saddled with.